grape: be at minnesota

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fruit tree
Weight: 0.76
, fruit
Weight: 0.66
, plant
Weight: 0.64
, crop
Weight: 0.63
, ingredient
Weight: 0.60
Siblings apple tree
Weight: 0.40
, pear tree
Weight: 0.39
, pear
Weight: 0.39
, oak tree
Weight: 0.38
, blueberry
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at minnesota 1.00
be at oklahoma 0.85
be at wisconsin 0.85
be at michigan 0.84
be at florida 0.83
be at indiana 0.83
be at ohio 0.82
be at illinois 0.82
be at texas 0.81
be at in texas 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(grape, be at minnesota)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(apple tree, be at oklahoma)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(grape, be at minnesota)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(apple tree, be at ohio)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(grape, be at minnesota)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(apple tree, be at wisconsin)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(grape, be at minnesota)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(apple tree, be at michigan)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(grape, be at minnesota)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(apple tree, be at florida)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(grape, be at minnesota)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(apple tree, be at indiana)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(grape, be at minnesota)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(apple tree, be at illinois)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(grape, be at minnesota)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(apple tree, be at texas)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(grape, be at minnesota)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(apple tree, be at in texas)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(grape, be at minnesota)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(apple tree, be at wisconsin)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(apple tree, be at wisconsin)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(grape, be at minnesota)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(apple tree, be at oklahoma)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(apple tree, be at oklahoma)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(grape, be at minnesota)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(apple tree, be at michigan)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(apple tree, be at michigan)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(grape, be at minnesota)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(apple tree, be at indiana)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(apple tree, be at indiana)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(grape, be at minnesota)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(apple tree, be at illinois)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(apple tree, be at illinois)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(grape, be at minnesota)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(apple tree, be at florida)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(apple tree, be at florida)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(grape, be at minnesota)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(apple tree, be at texas)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(apple tree, be at texas)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(grape, be at minnesota)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(apple tree, be at in texas)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(apple tree, be at in texas)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(grape, be at minnesota)
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(apple tree, be at ohio)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(apple tree, be at ohio)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(grape, be at minnesota)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(grape, be at minnesota)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(grape, be at minnesota)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(grape, be at ohio)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(grape, be at minnesota)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(grape, be at ohio)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(grape, be at minnesota)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(grape, be at ohio)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(grape, be at minnesota)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(grape, be at ohio)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(grape, be at minnesota)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(grape, be at minnesota)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(grape, be at minnesota)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(grape, be at minnesota)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(grape, be at minnesota)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(grape, be at minnesota)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(apple tree, be at wisconsin)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(grape, be at minnesota)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(apple tree, be at oklahoma)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(grape, be at minnesota)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(apple tree, be at michigan)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(grape, be at minnesota)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(apple tree, be at florida)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(grape, be at minnesota)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(apple tree, be at indiana)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(grape, be at minnesota)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(apple tree, be at illinois)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(grape, be at minnesota)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(apple tree, be at ohio)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(grape, be at minnesota)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(apple tree, be at texas)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(grape, be at minnesota)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(apple tree, be at in texas)