graph: be better than tables

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tool
Weight: 0.59
, item
Weight: 0.58
, feature
Weight: 0.57
, structure
Weight: 0.56
Siblings chart
Weight: 0.66
, asymptote
Weight: 0.34
, calculator
Weight: 0.33
, spreadsheet
Weight: 0.33
, map
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than tables 1.00
be more useful than tables 0.95
be used instead of frequency tables 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(graph, be better than tables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(graph, be better than tables)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(graph, be better than tables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(graph, be more useful than tables)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(graph, be better than tables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(graph, be more useful than tables)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(graph, be better than tables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(graph, be more useful than tables)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(graph, be better than tables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(graph, be used instead of frequency tables)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(graph, be better than tables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(graph, be used instead of frequency tables)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(graph, be better than tables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(graph, be used instead of frequency tables)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(graph, be better than tables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(graph, be more useful than tables)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(graph, be better than tables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(graph, be used instead of frequency tables)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(graph, be better than tables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(graph, be better than tables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(graph, be better than tables)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(graph, be better than tables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(graph, be better than tables)