graph: be more useful than tables

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tool
Weight: 0.59
, item
Weight: 0.58
, feature
Weight: 0.57
, structure
Weight: 0.56
Siblings chart
Weight: 0.66
, asymptote
Weight: 0.34
, calculator
Weight: 0.33
, spreadsheet
Weight: 0.33
, map
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more useful than tables 1.00
be better than tables 0.95
be used instead of frequency tables 0.84
is useful 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(feature, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(graph, be more useful than tables)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(graph, be more useful than tables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(feature, is useful)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(graph, be more useful than tables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(feature, is useful)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(graph, be more useful than tables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(chart, is useful)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(graph, be more useful than tables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(spreadsheet, is useful)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(graph, be more useful than tables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(map, is useful)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(feature, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(graph, be more useful than tables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(graph, be more useful than tables)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(graph, be more useful than tables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(map, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(map, is useful)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(graph, be more useful than tables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(spreadsheet, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(spreadsheet, is useful)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(graph, be more useful than tables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(chart, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(chart, is useful)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(graph, be more useful than tables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(graph, be more useful than tables)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(graph, be more useful than tables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(graph, be better than tables)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(graph, be more useful than tables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(graph, be better than tables)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(graph, be more useful than tables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(graph, be better than tables)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(graph, be more useful than tables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(graph, be used instead of frequency tables)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(graph, be more useful than tables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(graph, be used instead of frequency tables)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(graph, be more useful than tables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(graph, be used instead of frequency tables)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(graph, be more useful than tables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(graph, be better than tables)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(graph, be more useful than tables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(graph, be used instead of frequency tables)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(graph, be more useful than tables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(graph, is useful)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(graph, be more useful than tables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(graph, is useful)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(graph, be more useful than tables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(graph, is useful)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(graph, be more useful than tables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(graph, is useful)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(graph, be more useful than tables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(graph, be more useful than tables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(graph, be more useful than tables)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(graph, be more useful than tables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(graph, be more useful than tables)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(graph, be more useful than tables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(feature, is useful)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(graph, be more useful than tables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(spreadsheet, is useful)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(graph, be more useful than tables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(map, is useful)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(graph, be more useful than tables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(chart, is useful)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(graph, be more useful than tables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(feature, is useful)