graphics: have 2017 cards

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents graphic
Weight: 0.57
, design
Weight: 0.47
, topic
Weight: 0.44
, department
Weight: 0.39
, tool
Weight: 0.38
Siblings screen
Weight: 0.31
, animation
Weight: 0.31
, interface
Weight: 0.31
, design pattern
Weight: 0.30
, color
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
have cards 1.00
have 2017 cards 1.00
cards 0.99
have now cards 0.97
have used cards 0.97
have important cards 0.97
have big cards 0.94
have expensive cards 0.94
have expensive 2017 cards 0.94
have getting cards 0.93

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(graphics, have 2017 cards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(graphics, have 2017 cards)

Similarity expansion

0.83
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(graphics, have 2017 cards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(graphics, have cards)
0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(graphics, have 2017 cards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(graphics, have cards)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(graphics, have 2017 cards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(graphics, have used cards)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(graphics, have 2017 cards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(graphics, have cards)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(graphics, have 2017 cards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(graphics, have used cards)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(graphics, have 2017 cards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(graphics, cards)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(graphics, have 2017 cards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(graphics, cards)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(graphics, have 2017 cards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(graphics, have used cards)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(graphics, have 2017 cards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(graphics, have now cards)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(graphics, have 2017 cards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(graphics, cards)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(graphics, have 2017 cards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(graphics, have now cards)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(graphics, have 2017 cards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(graphics, have cards)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(graphics, have 2017 cards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(graphics, have now cards)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(graphics, have 2017 cards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(graphics, have used cards)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(graphics, have 2017 cards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(graphics, have expensive 2017 cards)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(graphics, have 2017 cards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(graphics, have big cards)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(graphics, have 2017 cards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(graphics, have getting cards)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(graphics, have 2017 cards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(graphics, have expensive cards)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(graphics, have 2017 cards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(graphics, have important cards)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(graphics, have 2017 cards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(graphics, have expensive 2017 cards)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(graphics, have 2017 cards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(graphics, cards)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(graphics, have 2017 cards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(graphics, have expensive 2017 cards)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(graphics, have 2017 cards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(graphics, have big cards)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(graphics, have 2017 cards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(graphics, have getting cards)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(graphics, have 2017 cards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(graphics, have big cards)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(graphics, have 2017 cards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(graphics, have expensive cards)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(graphics, have 2017 cards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(graphics, have getting cards)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(graphics, have 2017 cards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(graphics, have expensive cards)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(graphics, have 2017 cards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(graphics, have important cards)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(graphics, have 2017 cards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(graphics, have now cards)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(graphics, have 2017 cards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(graphics, have important cards)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(graphics, have 2017 cards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(graphics, have getting cards)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(graphics, have 2017 cards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(graphics, have expensive 2017 cards)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(graphics, have 2017 cards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(graphics, have big cards)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(graphics, have 2017 cards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(graphics, have expensive cards)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(graphics, have 2017 cards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(graphics, have important cards)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(graphics, have 2017 cards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(graphics, have 2017 cards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(graphics, have 2017 cards)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(graphics, have 2017 cards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(graphics, have 2017 cards)