graphics: have getting cards

Property	Similarity
have getting cards	1.00
have getting expensive cards	0.96
have getting more expensive cards	0.95
have now cards	0.94
have cards	0.93
have 2017 cards	0.93
have important cards	0.92
have big cards	0.91
have used cards	0.91
cards	0.90

0.77

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.10

Plausible(graphics, have getting cards) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Plausible(graphics, have cards)

0.76

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.12

Salient(graphics, have getting cards) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Salient(graphics, have cards)

0.76

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.14

Remarkable(graphics, have getting cards) ⋁

Evidence: 0.05

¬ Remarkable(graphics, have 2017 cards)

0.76

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.10

Plausible(graphics, have getting cards) ⋁

Evidence: 0.02

¬ Plausible(graphics, have used cards)

0.75

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.14

Remarkable(graphics, have getting cards) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Remarkable(graphics, have getting more expensive cards)

0.75

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.14

Remarkable(graphics, have getting cards) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Remarkable(graphics, have cards)

0.75

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.12

Salient(graphics, have getting cards) ⋁

Evidence: 0.07

¬ Salient(graphics, have 2017 cards)

0.75

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.12

Salient(graphics, have getting cards) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Salient(graphics, have used cards)

0.75

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.10

Plausible(graphics, have getting cards) ⋁

Evidence: 0.07

¬ Plausible(graphics, have 2017 cards)

0.74

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.10

Plausible(graphics, have getting cards) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Plausible(graphics, have now cards)

0.73

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.12

Salient(graphics, have getting cards) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Salient(graphics, have now cards)

0.73

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.12

Salient(graphics, have getting cards) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Salient(graphics, have getting more expensive cards)

0.73

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.14

Remarkable(graphics, have getting cards) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Remarkable(graphics, have used cards)

0.73

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.10

Plausible(graphics, have getting cards) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Plausible(graphics, have getting more expensive cards)

0.73

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.10

Plausible(graphics, have getting cards) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Plausible(graphics, cards)

0.72

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.14

Remarkable(graphics, have getting cards) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Remarkable(graphics, have now cards)

0.72

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.14

Remarkable(graphics, have getting cards) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Remarkable(graphics, have getting expensive cards)

0.72

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.12

Salient(graphics, have getting cards) ⋁

Evidence: 0.07

¬ Salient(graphics, cards)

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.14

Remarkable(graphics, have getting cards) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Remarkable(graphics, have big cards)

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.14

Remarkable(graphics, have getting cards) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Remarkable(graphics, cards)

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.32

Typical(graphics, have getting cards) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Typical(graphics, have cards)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.32

Typical(graphics, have getting cards) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Typical(graphics, have used cards)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.12

Salient(graphics, have getting cards) ⋁

Evidence: 0.18

¬ Salient(graphics, have getting expensive cards)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.14

Remarkable(graphics, have getting cards) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Remarkable(graphics, have important cards)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.12

Salient(graphics, have getting cards) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Salient(graphics, have big cards)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.10

Plausible(graphics, have getting cards) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Plausible(graphics, have big cards)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.12

Salient(graphics, have getting cards) ⋁

Evidence: 0.19

¬ Salient(graphics, have important cards)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.32

Typical(graphics, have getting cards) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Typical(graphics, cards)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.32

Typical(graphics, have getting cards) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Typical(graphics, have now cards)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.10

Plausible(graphics, have getting cards) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Plausible(graphics, have getting expensive cards)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.32

Typical(graphics, have getting cards) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Typical(graphics, have 2017 cards)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.10

Plausible(graphics, have getting cards) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

¬ Plausible(graphics, have important cards)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.32

Typical(graphics, have getting cards) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Typical(graphics, have getting more expensive cards)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.32

Typical(graphics, have getting cards) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Typical(graphics, have big cards)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.32

Typical(graphics, have getting cards) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Typical(graphics, have getting expensive cards)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.32

Typical(graphics, have getting cards) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Typical(graphics, have important cards)

Parents	graphic Weight: 0.57 , design Weight: 0.47 , topic Weight: 0.44 , department Weight: 0.39 , tool Weight: 0.38
Siblings	screen Weight: 0.31 , animation Weight: 0.31 , interface Weight: 0.31 , design pattern Weight: 0.30 , color Weight: 0.30

graphics: have getting cards

Related concepts

Related properties

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

Similarity expansion

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

Typical implies Plausible