graphite: is metal

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents material
Weight: 0.65
, substance
Weight: 0.63
, ceramic
Weight: 0.60
, silicon carbide
Weight: 0.56
, tool
Weight: 0.55
Siblings titanium dioxide
Weight: 0.37
, aluminum oxide
Weight: 0.36
, magnesium oxide
Weight: 0.36
, aluminum foil
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
is metal 1.00
be different from metal 0.92
is non metal 0.91

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(tool, is metal)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(graphite, is metal)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(graphite, is metal)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(tool, is metal)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.54
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(graphite, is metal)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(tool, is metal)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(tool, is metal)
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(graphite, is metal)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(graphite, is metal)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(graphite, is metal)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(graphite, is metal)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(graphite, is metal)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(graphite, is non metal)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(graphite, is metal)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(graphite, is non metal)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(graphite, is metal)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(graphite, is non metal)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(graphite, is metal)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(graphite, be different from metal)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(graphite, is metal)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(graphite, be different from metal)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(graphite, is metal)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(graphite, be different from metal)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(graphite, is metal)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(graphite, is non metal)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(graphite, is metal)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(graphite, be different from metal)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(graphite, is metal)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(graphite, is metal)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(graphite, is metal)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(graphite, is metal)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(graphite, is metal)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(graphite, is metal)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(tool, is metal)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(graphite, is metal)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(tool, is metal)