graphite: is non metal

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents material
Weight: 0.65
, substance
Weight: 0.63
, ceramic
Weight: 0.60
, silicon carbide
Weight: 0.56
, tool
Weight: 0.55
Siblings titanium dioxide
Weight: 0.37
, aluminum oxide
Weight: 0.36
, magnesium oxide
Weight: 0.36
, aluminum foil
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
is non metal 1.00
is metal 0.91
be different from metal 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(tool, is metal)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(graphite, is non metal)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(graphite, is non metal)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(tool, is metal)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.52
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(graphite, is non metal)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(tool, is metal)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(tool, is metal)
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(graphite, is non metal)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(graphite, is non metal)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(graphite, is non metal)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(graphite, is non metal)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(graphite, is non metal)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(graphite, is metal)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(graphite, is non metal)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(graphite, is metal)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(graphite, is non metal)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(graphite, is metal)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(graphite, is non metal)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(graphite, be different from metal)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(graphite, is non metal)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(graphite, be different from metal)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(graphite, is non metal)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(graphite, is metal)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(graphite, is non metal)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(graphite, be different from metal)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(graphite, is non metal)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(graphite, be different from metal)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(graphite, is non metal)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(graphite, is non metal)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(graphite, is non metal)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(graphite, is non metal)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(graphite, is non metal)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(graphite, is non metal)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(tool, is metal)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(graphite, is non metal)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(tool, is metal)