grassland: have large trees

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents habitat
Weight: 0.73
, ecosystem
Weight: 0.57
, area
Weight: 0.52
, land
Weight: 0.50
, altitude
Weight: 0.49
Siblings wetland
Weight: 0.38
, marsh
Weight: 0.36
, grass
Weight: 0.35
, moss
Weight: 0.34
, pond
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
have large trees 1.00
have few large trees 0.94
have trees 0.93
have less trees 0.90
have few trees 0.89
be prevalent natural vegetation of central low lands 0.78
be prevalent natural vegetation of central lands 0.77
be prevalent natural vegetation of low lands 0.77
be prevalent natural vegetation of lands 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(grassland, have large trees)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(grassland, have large trees)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(grassland, have large trees)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(grassland, have trees)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(grassland, have large trees)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(grassland, have trees)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(grassland, have large trees)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(grassland, have trees)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(grassland, have large trees)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(grassland, have few large trees)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(grassland, have large trees)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(grassland, have less trees)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(grassland, have large trees)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(grassland, have less trees)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(grassland, have large trees)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(grassland, have few large trees)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(grassland, have large trees)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(grassland, have less trees)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(grassland, have large trees)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(grassland, have few trees)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(grassland, have large trees)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(grassland, have few large trees)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(grassland, have large trees)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(grassland, have few trees)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(grassland, have large trees)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(grassland, have few trees)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(grassland, have large trees)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(grassland, have few large trees)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(grassland, have large trees)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(grassland, be prevalent natural vegetation of central low lands)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(grassland, have large trees)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(grassland, have less trees)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(grassland, have large trees)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(grassland, be prevalent natural vegetation of low lands)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(grassland, have large trees)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(grassland, be prevalent natural vegetation of central lands)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(grassland, have large trees)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(grassland, be prevalent natural vegetation of central low lands)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(grassland, have large trees)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(grassland, be prevalent natural vegetation of lands)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(grassland, have large trees)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(grassland, be prevalent natural vegetation of central low lands)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(grassland, have large trees)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(grassland, be prevalent natural vegetation of central lands)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(grassland, have large trees)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(grassland, be prevalent natural vegetation of low lands)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(grassland, have large trees)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(grassland, be prevalent natural vegetation of central lands)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(grassland, have large trees)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(grassland, be prevalent natural vegetation of low lands)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(grassland, have large trees)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(grassland, be prevalent natural vegetation of lands)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(grassland, have large trees)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(grassland, be prevalent natural vegetation of lands)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(grassland, have large trees)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(grassland, have few trees)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(grassland, have large trees)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(grassland, be prevalent natural vegetation of central low lands)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(grassland, have large trees)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(grassland, be prevalent natural vegetation of central lands)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(grassland, have large trees)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(grassland, have trees)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(grassland, have large trees)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(grassland, be prevalent natural vegetation of low lands)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(grassland, have large trees)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(grassland, be prevalent natural vegetation of lands)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(grassland, have large trees)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(grassland, have large trees)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(grassland, have large trees)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(grassland, have large trees)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(grassland, have large trees)