grassland: be prevalent natural vegetation of central lands

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents habitat
Weight: 0.73
, ecosystem
Weight: 0.57
, area
Weight: 0.52
, land
Weight: 0.50
, altitude
Weight: 0.49
Siblings wetland
Weight: 0.38
, marsh
Weight: 0.36
, grass
Weight: 0.35
, moss
Weight: 0.34
, pond
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be prevalent natural vegetation of central lands 1.00
be prevalent natural vegetation of central low lands 0.99
be prevalent natural vegetation of lands 0.98
be prevalent natural vegetation of low lands 0.98
be used as grazing lands 0.83
be called grasslands 0.81
be in rather tropical rain forests 0.80
be in same latitude as forests 0.79
be important to ecosystems 0.78
have large trees 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(grassland, be prevalent natural vegetation of central lands)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(grassland, be prevalent natural vegetation of central lands)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(grassland, be prevalent natural vegetation of central lands)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(grassland, be prevalent natural vegetation of central low lands)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(grassland, be prevalent natural vegetation of central lands)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(grassland, be prevalent natural vegetation of low lands)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(grassland, be prevalent natural vegetation of central lands)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(grassland, be prevalent natural vegetation of lands)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(grassland, be prevalent natural vegetation of central lands)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(grassland, be prevalent natural vegetation of central low lands)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(grassland, be prevalent natural vegetation of central lands)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(grassland, be prevalent natural vegetation of central low lands)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(grassland, be prevalent natural vegetation of central lands)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(grassland, be prevalent natural vegetation of low lands)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(grassland, be prevalent natural vegetation of central lands)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(grassland, be prevalent natural vegetation of lands)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(grassland, be prevalent natural vegetation of central lands)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(grassland, be prevalent natural vegetation of central low lands)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(grassland, be prevalent natural vegetation of central lands)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(grassland, be used as grazing lands)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(grassland, be prevalent natural vegetation of central lands)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(grassland, be in rather tropical rain forests)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(grassland, be prevalent natural vegetation of central lands)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(grassland, be prevalent natural vegetation of low lands)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(grassland, be prevalent natural vegetation of central lands)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(grassland, be called grasslands)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(grassland, be prevalent natural vegetation of central lands)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(grassland, be in rather tropical rain forests)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(grassland, be prevalent natural vegetation of central lands)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(grassland, be prevalent natural vegetation of lands)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(grassland, be prevalent natural vegetation of central lands)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(grassland, be in rather tropical rain forests)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(grassland, be prevalent natural vegetation of central lands)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(grassland, be in same latitude as forests)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(grassland, be prevalent natural vegetation of central lands)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(grassland, be in rather tropical rain forests)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(grassland, be prevalent natural vegetation of central lands)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(grassland, be called grasslands)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(grassland, be prevalent natural vegetation of central lands)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(grassland, be prevalent natural vegetation of low lands)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(grassland, be prevalent natural vegetation of central lands)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(grassland, be important to ecosystems)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(grassland, be prevalent natural vegetation of central lands)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(grassland, be prevalent natural vegetation of lands)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(grassland, be prevalent natural vegetation of central lands)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(grassland, be in same latitude as forests)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(grassland, be prevalent natural vegetation of central lands)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(grassland, be used as grazing lands)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(grassland, be prevalent natural vegetation of central lands)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(grassland, have large trees)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(grassland, be prevalent natural vegetation of central lands)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(grassland, be called grasslands)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(grassland, be prevalent natural vegetation of central lands)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(grassland, be used as grazing lands)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(grassland, be prevalent natural vegetation of central lands)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(grassland, be in same latitude as forests)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(grassland, be prevalent natural vegetation of central lands)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(grassland, be important to ecosystems)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(grassland, be prevalent natural vegetation of central lands)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(grassland, have large trees)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(grassland, be prevalent natural vegetation of central lands)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(grassland, have large trees)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(grassland, be prevalent natural vegetation of central lands)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(grassland, have large trees)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(grassland, be prevalent natural vegetation of central lands)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(grassland, be important to ecosystems)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(grassland, be prevalent natural vegetation of central lands)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(grassland, be used as grazing lands)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(grassland, be prevalent natural vegetation of central lands)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(grassland, be important to ecosystems)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(grassland, be prevalent natural vegetation of central lands)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(grassland, be in same latitude as forests)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(grassland, be prevalent natural vegetation of central lands)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(grassland, be called grasslands)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(grassland, be prevalent natural vegetation of central lands)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(grassland, be prevalent natural vegetation of central lands)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(grassland, be prevalent natural vegetation of central lands)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(grassland, be prevalent natural vegetation of central lands)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(grassland, be prevalent natural vegetation of central lands)