grave: have fences

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents site
Weight: 0.57
, place
Weight: 0.56
, poet
Weight: 0.54
, web site
Weight: 0.52
Siblings churchyard
Weight: 0.39
, cemetery
Weight: 0.34
, historical site
Weight: 0.33
, graveyard
Weight: 0.33
, memorial
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
have fences 1.00
have fences around them 0.95
is fenced in 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(grave, have fences)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(graveyard, have fences)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(grave, have fences)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(cemetery, have fences)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(grave, have fences)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(cemetery, have fences around them)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(grave, have fences)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(cemetery, have fences around them)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(cemetery, have fences around them)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(grave, have fences)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(graveyard, have fences)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(graveyard, have fences)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(grave, have fences)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(cemetery, have fences)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(cemetery, have fences)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(grave, have fences)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(grave, have fences)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(grave, have fences)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(grave, have fences around them)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(grave, have fences)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(grave, have fences around them)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(grave, have fences)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(grave, have fences around them)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(grave, have fences)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(grave, is fenced in)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(grave, have fences)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(grave, is fenced in)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(grave, have fences)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(grave, have fences)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(grave, have fences)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(grave, have fences)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(grave, have fences)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(grave, have fences)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(graveyard, have fences)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(grave, have fences)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(cemetery, have fences)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(grave, have fences)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(cemetery, have fences around them)