great ape: be considered animals

Related concepts

Parents	primate Weight: 0.66 , endangered species Weight: 0.66 , animal Weight: 0.64 , thing Weight: 0.63
Siblings	gorilla Weight: 0.79 , chimpanzee Weight: 0.74 , orangutan Weight: 0.72 , bonobo Weight: 0.68 , ape Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be considered animals	1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.01

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.07
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Remarkable(great ape, be considered animals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Remarkable(ape, be considered animals)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.19

Plausible(great ape, be considered animals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

Remarkable(ape, be considered animals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Plausible(ape, be considered animals)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.19

Plausible(great ape, be considered animals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Salient(great ape, be considered animals)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.45

Salient(great ape, be considered animals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.02

¬ Typical(great ape, be considered animals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Remarkable(great ape, be considered animals)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.19

Plausible(great ape, be considered animals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.02

¬ Typical(great ape, be considered animals)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Remarkable(great ape, be considered animals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Typical(ape, be considered animals)