ape: be considered animals

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents wild animal
Weight: 0.64
, monkey
Weight: 0.61
, animal
Weight: 0.61
, creature
Weight: 0.58
, beast
Weight: 0.58
Siblings chimpanzee
Weight: 0.75
, orangutan
Weight: 0.74
, bonobo
Weight: 0.63
, gorilla
Weight: 0.60
, great ape
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered animals 1.00
be like humans 0.77
be different from humans 0.77
act like humans 0.76
be like monkeys 0.76
react to apes of different species 0.75
react to apes of species 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(monkey, be like humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(ape, be considered animals)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(ape, be considered animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(monkey, be like humans)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.08
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(ape, be considered animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(monkey, be like humans)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(ape, be considered animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(orangutan, be like humans)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(ape, be considered animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(orangutan, act like humans)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.07
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(ape, be considered animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(great ape, be considered animals)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.09
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(ape, be considered animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(chimpanzee, be like humans)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.07
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(ape, be considered animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(gorilla, act like humans)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(monkey, be like humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(ape, be considered animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(ape, be considered animals)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(ape, be considered animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(great ape, be considered animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(great ape, be considered animals)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(ape, be considered animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(chimpanzee, be like humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(chimpanzee, be like humans)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(ape, be considered animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(gorilla, act like humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(gorilla, act like humans)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(ape, be considered animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(orangutan, act like humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(orangutan, act like humans)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(ape, be considered animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(orangutan, be like humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(orangutan, be like humans)

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(ape, be considered animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(ape, be considered animals)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(ape, be considered animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(ape, be like humans)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(ape, be considered animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(ape, be different from humans)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(ape, be considered animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(ape, be like monkeys)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(ape, be considered animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(ape, act like humans)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(ape, be considered animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(ape, act like humans)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(ape, be considered animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(ape, act like humans)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(ape, be considered animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(ape, be different from humans)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(ape, be considered animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(ape, act like humans)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(ape, be considered animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(ape, be different from humans)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(ape, be considered animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(ape, be different from humans)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(ape, be considered animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(ape, be like monkeys)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(ape, be considered animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(ape, be like humans)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(ape, be considered animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(ape, be like humans)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(ape, be considered animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(ape, be like humans)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(ape, be considered animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(ape, be like monkeys)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(ape, be considered animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(ape, be like monkeys)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(ape, be considered animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(ape, be considered animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(ape, be considered animals)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(ape, be considered animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(ape, be considered animals)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(ape, be considered animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(monkey, be like humans)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(ape, be considered animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(great ape, be considered animals)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(ape, be considered animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(gorilla, act like humans)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(ape, be considered animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(orangutan, act like humans)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(ape, be considered animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(chimpanzee, be like humans)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(ape, be considered animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(orangutan, be like humans)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(ape, be considered animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(monkey, be like humans)