ape: be like monkeys

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents wild animal
Weight: 0.64
, monkey
Weight: 0.61
, animal
Weight: 0.61
, creature
Weight: 0.58
, beast
Weight: 0.58
Siblings chimpanzee
Weight: 0.75
, orangutan
Weight: 0.74
, bonobo
Weight: 0.63
, gorilla
Weight: 0.60
, great ape
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be like monkeys 1.00
is monkeys 0.98
eat monkeys 0.95
be confused with monkeys 0.90
be smarter than monkeys 0.88
be like humans 0.82
react to apes of different species 0.79
is apes 0.78
react to apes of species 0.78
react to apes 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(monkey, be like humans)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(ape, be like monkeys)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(monkey, is monkeys)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(ape, be like monkeys)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(monkey, eat monkeys)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(ape, be like monkeys)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(ape, be like monkeys)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(monkey, eat monkeys)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(ape, be like monkeys)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(monkey, is monkeys)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(ape, be like monkeys)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(monkey, be like humans)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(ape, be like monkeys)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(monkey, eat monkeys)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(ape, be like monkeys)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(monkey, is monkeys)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(ape, be like monkeys)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(monkey, be like humans)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(ape, be like monkeys)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(chimpanzee, eat monkeys)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(ape, be like monkeys)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(orangutan, be like humans)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(ape, be like monkeys)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(chimpanzee, be like humans)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(monkey, is monkeys)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(ape, be like monkeys)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(ape, be like monkeys)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(monkey, eat monkeys)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(ape, be like monkeys)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(ape, be like monkeys)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(monkey, be like humans)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(ape, be like monkeys)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(ape, be like monkeys)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(ape, be like monkeys)
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(chimpanzee, eat monkeys)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(chimpanzee, eat monkeys)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(ape, be like monkeys)
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(chimpanzee, be like humans)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(chimpanzee, be like humans)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(ape, be like monkeys)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(orangutan, be like humans)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(orangutan, be like humans)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(ape, be like monkeys)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(ape, be like monkeys)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(ape, be like monkeys)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(ape, is monkeys)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(ape, be like monkeys)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(ape, eat monkeys)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(ape, be like monkeys)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(ape, eat monkeys)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(ape, be like monkeys)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(ape, eat monkeys)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(ape, be like monkeys)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(ape, is monkeys)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(ape, be like monkeys)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(ape, is monkeys)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(ape, be like monkeys)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(ape, eat monkeys)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(ape, be like monkeys)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(ape, is apes)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(ape, be like monkeys)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(ape, be confused with monkeys)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(ape, be like monkeys)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(ape, is monkeys)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(ape, be like monkeys)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(ape, react to apes)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(ape, be like monkeys)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(ape, be smarter than monkeys)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(ape, be like monkeys)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(ape, is apes)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(ape, be like monkeys)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(ape, be confused with monkeys)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(ape, be like monkeys)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(ape, be smarter than monkeys)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(ape, be like monkeys)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(ape, be like humans)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(ape, be like monkeys)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(ape, is apes)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(ape, be like monkeys)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(ape, react to apes)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(ape, be like monkeys)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(ape, be like humans)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(ape, be like monkeys)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(ape, react to apes)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(ape, be like monkeys)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(ape, be like humans)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(ape, be like monkeys)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(ape, be confused with monkeys)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(ape, be like monkeys)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(ape, be smarter than monkeys)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(ape, be like monkeys)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(ape, be smarter than monkeys)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(ape, be like monkeys)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(ape, be confused with monkeys)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(ape, be like monkeys)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(ape, be like humans)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(ape, be like monkeys)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(ape, is apes)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(ape, be like monkeys)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(ape, react to apes)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(ape, be like monkeys)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(ape, be like monkeys)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(ape, be like monkeys)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(ape, be like monkeys)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(ape, be like monkeys)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(ape, be like monkeys)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(monkey, is monkeys)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(ape, be like monkeys)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(monkey, eat monkeys)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(ape, be like monkeys)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(monkey, be like humans)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(ape, be like monkeys)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(chimpanzee, eat monkeys)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(ape, be like monkeys)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(chimpanzee, be like humans)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(ape, be like monkeys)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(orangutan, be like humans)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(ape, be like monkeys)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(monkey, is monkeys)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(ape, be like monkeys)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(monkey, eat monkeys)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(ape, be like monkeys)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(monkey, be like humans)