ape: be smarter than monkeys

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents wild animal
Weight: 0.64
, monkey
Weight: 0.61
, animal
Weight: 0.61
, creature
Weight: 0.58
, beast
Weight: 0.58
Siblings chimpanzee
Weight: 0.75
, orangutan
Weight: 0.74
, bonobo
Weight: 0.63
, gorilla
Weight: 0.60
, great ape
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be smarter than monkeys 1.00
be like monkeys 0.88
is monkeys 0.86
eat monkeys 0.86
be confused with monkeys 0.84
be stronger than humans 0.81
be much stronger than humans 0.81
be like humans 0.77
react to apes of different species 0.76
be different from humans 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(monkey, be stronger than humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(ape, be smarter than monkeys)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(monkey, be like humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(ape, be smarter than monkeys)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(monkey, is monkeys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(ape, be smarter than monkeys)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(monkey, eat monkeys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(ape, be smarter than monkeys)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(ape, be smarter than monkeys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(monkey, eat monkeys)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(ape, be smarter than monkeys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(monkey, is monkeys)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(ape, be smarter than monkeys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(monkey, be stronger than humans)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(ape, be smarter than monkeys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(monkey, be like humans)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(ape, be smarter than monkeys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(monkey, eat monkeys)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(ape, be smarter than monkeys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(monkey, be stronger than humans)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(ape, be smarter than monkeys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(monkey, is monkeys)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(ape, be smarter than monkeys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(monkey, be like humans)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(ape, be smarter than monkeys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(chimpanzee, eat monkeys)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(ape, be smarter than monkeys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(orangutan, be stronger than humans)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(ape, be smarter than monkeys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(orangutan, be like humans)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(ape, be smarter than monkeys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(chimpanzee, be stronger than humans)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(ape, be smarter than monkeys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(chimpanzee, be like humans)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(monkey, be stronger than humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(ape, be smarter than monkeys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(ape, be smarter than monkeys)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(monkey, is monkeys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(ape, be smarter than monkeys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(ape, be smarter than monkeys)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(monkey, be like humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(ape, be smarter than monkeys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(ape, be smarter than monkeys)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(monkey, eat monkeys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(ape, be smarter than monkeys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(ape, be smarter than monkeys)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(ape, be smarter than monkeys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(chimpanzee, eat monkeys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(chimpanzee, eat monkeys)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(ape, be smarter than monkeys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(chimpanzee, be stronger than humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(chimpanzee, be stronger than humans)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(ape, be smarter than monkeys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(orangutan, be stronger than humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(orangutan, be stronger than humans)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(ape, be smarter than monkeys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(chimpanzee, be like humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(chimpanzee, be like humans)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(ape, be smarter than monkeys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(orangutan, be like humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(orangutan, be like humans)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(ape, be smarter than monkeys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(ape, be smarter than monkeys)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(ape, be smarter than monkeys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(ape, is monkeys)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(ape, be smarter than monkeys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(ape, eat monkeys)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(ape, be smarter than monkeys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(ape, eat monkeys)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(ape, be smarter than monkeys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(ape, eat monkeys)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(ape, be smarter than monkeys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(ape, is monkeys)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(ape, be smarter than monkeys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(ape, is monkeys)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(ape, be smarter than monkeys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(ape, eat monkeys)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(ape, be smarter than monkeys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(ape, be like monkeys)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(ape, be smarter than monkeys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(ape, be like monkeys)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(ape, be smarter than monkeys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(ape, be like monkeys)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(ape, be smarter than monkeys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(ape, be different from humans)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(ape, be smarter than monkeys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(ape, be confused with monkeys)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(ape, be smarter than monkeys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(ape, be like humans)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(ape, be smarter than monkeys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(ape, be confused with monkeys)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(ape, be smarter than monkeys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(ape, be confused with monkeys)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(ape, be smarter than monkeys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(ape, be stronger than humans)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(ape, be smarter than monkeys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(ape, be stronger than humans)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(ape, be smarter than monkeys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(ape, be much stronger than humans)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(ape, be smarter than monkeys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(ape, be much stronger than humans)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(ape, be smarter than monkeys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(ape, be different from humans)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(ape, be smarter than monkeys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(ape, be confused with monkeys)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(ape, be smarter than monkeys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(ape, be like humans)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(ape, be smarter than monkeys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(ape, be different from humans)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(ape, be smarter than monkeys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(ape, be like humans)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(ape, be smarter than monkeys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(ape, be like monkeys)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(ape, be smarter than monkeys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(ape, be stronger than humans)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(ape, be smarter than monkeys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(ape, be much stronger than humans)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(ape, be smarter than monkeys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(ape, is monkeys)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(ape, be smarter than monkeys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(ape, be stronger than humans)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(ape, be smarter than monkeys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(ape, be much stronger than humans)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(ape, be smarter than monkeys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(ape, be like humans)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(ape, be smarter than monkeys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(ape, be different from humans)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(ape, be smarter than monkeys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(ape, be smarter than monkeys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(ape, be smarter than monkeys)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(ape, be smarter than monkeys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(ape, be smarter than monkeys)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(ape, be smarter than monkeys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(monkey, is monkeys)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(ape, be smarter than monkeys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(monkey, eat monkeys)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(ape, be smarter than monkeys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(monkey, be like humans)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(ape, be smarter than monkeys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(monkey, be stronger than humans)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(ape, be smarter than monkeys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(chimpanzee, eat monkeys)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(ape, be smarter than monkeys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(chimpanzee, be stronger than humans)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(ape, be smarter than monkeys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(chimpanzee, be like humans)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(ape, be smarter than monkeys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(orangutan, be stronger than humans)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(ape, be smarter than monkeys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(orangutan, be like humans)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(ape, be smarter than monkeys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(monkey, is monkeys)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(ape, be smarter than monkeys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(monkey, eat monkeys)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(ape, be smarter than monkeys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(monkey, be like humans)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(ape, be smarter than monkeys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(monkey, be stronger than humans)