great britain: was able

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents america
Weight: 0.71
, european union
Weight: 0.70
, north america
Weight: 0.68
, ireland
Weight: 0.66
, democracy
Weight: 0.65
Siblings britain
Weight: 0.60
, latin america
Weight: 0.38
, south america
Weight: 0.38
, central america
Weight: 0.37
, germany
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
was able 1.00
was in need in 1773 0.78
was eager 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(great britain, was able) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(britain, was able)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(great britain, was able) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(germany, was able)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(great britain, was able) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(germany, was able) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(germany, was able)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(great britain, was able) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(britain, was able) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(britain, was able)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(great britain, was able) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(great britain, was able)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(great britain, was able) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(great britain, was eager)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(great britain, was able) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(great britain, was eager)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(great britain, was able) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(great britain, was eager)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(great britain, was able) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(great britain, was eager)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(great britain, was able) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(great britain, was able) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(great britain, was able)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(great britain, was able) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(great britain, was able)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(great britain, was able) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(germany, was able)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(great britain, was able) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(britain, was able)