great dane: have cropped ears

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents breed
Weight: 0.66
, thing
Weight: 0.60
, dog
Weight: 0.56
, puppy
Weight: 0.54
, monster
Weight: 0.53
Siblings rottweiler
Weight: 0.45
, good luck
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
have cropped ears 1.00
has physical part ears 0.78
have pointy ears 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, has physical part ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(great dane, have cropped ears)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(puppy, has physical part ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(great dane, have cropped ears)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(great dane, have cropped ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(puppy, has physical part ears)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(great dane, have cropped ears) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(dog, has physical part ears)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(great dane, have cropped ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(puppy, has physical part ears)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(great dane, have cropped ears) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(dog, has physical part ears)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, has physical part ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(great dane, have cropped ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(great dane, have cropped ears)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(puppy, has physical part ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(great dane, have cropped ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(great dane, have cropped ears)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(great dane, have cropped ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(great dane, have cropped ears)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(great dane, have cropped ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(great dane, has physical part ears)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(great dane, have cropped ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(great dane, has physical part ears)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(great dane, have cropped ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(great dane, have pointy ears)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(great dane, have cropped ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(great dane, has physical part ears)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(great dane, have cropped ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(great dane, has physical part ears)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(great dane, have cropped ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(great dane, have pointy ears)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(great dane, have cropped ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(great dane, have pointy ears)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(great dane, have cropped ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(great dane, have pointy ears)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(great dane, have cropped ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(great dane, have cropped ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(great dane, have cropped ears)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(great dane, have cropped ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(great dane, have cropped ears)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(great dane, have cropped ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(puppy, has physical part ears)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(great dane, have cropped ears) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(dog, has physical part ears)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(great dane, have cropped ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(puppy, has physical part ears)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(great dane, have cropped ears) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(dog, has physical part ears)