great white shark: attack people

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents shark
Weight: 0.79
, predator
Weight: 0.72
, fish
Weight: 0.67
, animal
Weight: 0.65
, species
Weight: 0.65
Siblings whale shark
Weight: 0.42
, hammerhead shark
Weight: 0.41
, tiger shark
Weight: 0.41

Related properties

Property Similarity
attack people 1.00
attack humans 0.88
survive under when attack 0.81
survive under attack 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(shark, attack people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(great white shark, attack people)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(shark, attack humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(great white shark, attack people)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(great white shark, attack people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(shark, attack people)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(great white shark, attack people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(shark, attack humans)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.56
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(great white shark, attack people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(shark, attack people)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(great white shark, attack people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(shark, attack humans)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(great white shark, attack people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(tiger shark, attack people)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(shark, attack people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(great white shark, attack people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(great white shark, attack people)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(shark, attack humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(great white shark, attack people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(great white shark, attack people)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(great white shark, attack people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(tiger shark, attack people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(tiger shark, attack people)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(great white shark, attack people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(great white shark, attack people)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(great white shark, attack people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(great white shark, survive under when attack)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(great white shark, attack people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(great white shark, survive under when attack)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(great white shark, attack people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(great white shark, survive under when attack)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(great white shark, attack people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(great white shark, survive under attack)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(great white shark, attack people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(great white shark, survive under attack)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(great white shark, attack people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(great white shark, survive under attack)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(great white shark, attack people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(great white shark, attack humans)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(great white shark, attack people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(great white shark, attack humans)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(great white shark, attack people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(great white shark, attack humans)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(great white shark, attack people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(great white shark, survive under when attack)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(great white shark, attack people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(great white shark, attack humans)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(great white shark, attack people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(great white shark, survive under attack)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(great white shark, attack people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(great white shark, attack people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(great white shark, attack people)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(great white shark, attack people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(great white shark, attack people)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(great white shark, attack people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(shark, attack people)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(great white shark, attack people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(shark, attack humans)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(great white shark, attack people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(tiger shark, attack people)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(great white shark, attack people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(shark, attack people)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(great white shark, attack people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(shark, attack humans)