tiger shark: attack people

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents species
Weight: 0.67
, shark
Weight: 0.64
, animal
Weight: 0.64
, predator
Weight: 0.58
Siblings whale shark
Weight: 0.42
, bull shark
Weight: 0.42
, great white shark
Weight: 0.41
, hammerhead shark
Weight: 0.41
, tiger
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
attack people 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(shark, attack people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(tiger shark, attack people)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(tiger shark, attack people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(shark, attack people)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.55
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(tiger shark, attack people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(shark, attack people)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(tiger shark, attack people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(great white shark, attack people)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(shark, attack people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(tiger shark, attack people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(tiger shark, attack people)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(tiger shark, attack people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(great white shark, attack people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(great white shark, attack people)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(tiger shark, attack people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(tiger shark, attack people)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(tiger shark, attack people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(tiger shark, attack people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(tiger shark, attack people)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(tiger shark, attack people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(tiger shark, attack people)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(tiger shark, attack people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(shark, attack people)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(tiger shark, attack people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(great white shark, attack people)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(tiger shark, attack people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(shark, attack people)