great white shark: be in southern california

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents shark
Weight: 0.79
, predator
Weight: 0.72
, fish
Weight: 0.67
, animal
Weight: 0.65
, species
Weight: 0.65
Siblings whale shark
Weight: 0.42
, hammerhead shark
Weight: 0.41
, tiger shark
Weight: 0.41

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in southern california 1.00
be in california 0.94
be protected in california 0.89
be in florida 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(great white shark, be in southern california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(great white shark, be in southern california)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(great white shark, be in southern california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(great white shark, be in california)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(great white shark, be in southern california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(great white shark, be in california)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(great white shark, be in southern california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(great white shark, be in california)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(great white shark, be in southern california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(great white shark, be protected in california)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(great white shark, be in southern california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(great white shark, be protected in california)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(great white shark, be in southern california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(great white shark, be protected in california)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(great white shark, be in southern california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(great white shark, be in california)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(great white shark, be in southern california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(great white shark, be protected in california)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(great white shark, be in southern california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(great white shark, be in florida)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(great white shark, be in southern california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(great white shark, be in florida)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(great white shark, be in southern california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(great white shark, be in florida)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(great white shark, be in southern california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(great white shark, be in florida)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(great white shark, be in southern california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(great white shark, be in southern california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(great white shark, be in southern california)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(great white shark, be in southern california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(great white shark, be in southern california)