great white shark: be protected in california

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents shark
Weight: 0.79
, predator
Weight: 0.72
, fish
Weight: 0.67
, animal
Weight: 0.65
, species
Weight: 0.65
Siblings whale shark
Weight: 0.42
, hammerhead shark
Weight: 0.41
, tiger shark
Weight: 0.41

Related properties

Property Similarity
be protected in california 1.00
be in california 0.94
be in southern california 0.89
is protected 0.81
be in florida 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(species, is protected)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(great white shark, be protected in california)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(great white shark, be protected in california)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(species, is protected)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(great white shark, be protected in california)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(species, is protected)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(great white shark, be protected in california)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(whale shark, is protected)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(species, is protected)
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(great white shark, be protected in california)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(great white shark, be protected in california)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(great white shark, be protected in california)
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(whale shark, is protected)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(whale shark, is protected)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(great white shark, be protected in california)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(great white shark, be protected in california)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(great white shark, be protected in california)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(great white shark, be in california)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(great white shark, be protected in california)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(great white shark, be in california)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(great white shark, be protected in california)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(great white shark, be in california)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(great white shark, be protected in california)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(great white shark, be in southern california)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(great white shark, be protected in california)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(great white shark, be in southern california)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(great white shark, be protected in california)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(great white shark, be in southern california)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(great white shark, be protected in california)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(great white shark, be in california)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(great white shark, be protected in california)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(great white shark, be in florida)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(great white shark, be protected in california)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(great white shark, be in florida)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(great white shark, be protected in california)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(great white shark, be in florida)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(great white shark, be protected in california)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(great white shark, be in southern california)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(great white shark, be protected in california)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(great white shark, be in florida)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(great white shark, be protected in california)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(great white shark, be protected in california)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(great white shark, be protected in california)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(great white shark, be protected in california)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(great white shark, be protected in california)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(great white shark, be protected in california)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(species, is protected)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(great white shark, be protected in california)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(whale shark, is protected)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(great white shark, be protected in california)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(species, is protected)