greenland: be covered in ice

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents island
Weight: 0.61
, land
Weight: 0.59
, place
Weight: 0.57
, region
Weight: 0.56
, area
Weight: 0.54
Siblings cayman islands
Weight: 0.35
, long island
Weight: 0.34
, rhode island
Weight: 0.34
, solomon islands
Weight: 0.34
, staten island
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be covered in ice 1.00
covered in ice 1.00
be covered with ice 0.99
be covered in ice covered in green 0.96
be covered with snow 0.89
have ice 0.88
is ice 0.87
be made of ice 0.87
be called ice 0.87
be full of ice 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(greenland, be covered in ice)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(greenland, be covered in ice)

Similarity expansion

0.84
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(greenland, be covered in ice)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(greenland, covered in ice)
0.84
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(greenland, be covered in ice)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(greenland, covered in ice)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(greenland, be covered in ice)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(greenland, be covered with ice)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(greenland, be covered in ice)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(greenland, be covered with ice)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(greenland, be covered in ice)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(greenland, covered in ice)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(greenland, be covered in ice)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(greenland, be covered in ice covered in green)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(greenland, be covered in ice)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(greenland, is ice)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(greenland, be covered in ice)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(greenland, covered in ice)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(greenland, be covered in ice)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(greenland, be covered in ice covered in green)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(greenland, be covered in ice)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(greenland, is ice)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(greenland, be covered in ice)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(greenland, be made of ice)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(greenland, be covered in ice)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(greenland, be called ice)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(greenland, be covered in ice)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(greenland, be called ice)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(greenland, be covered in ice)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(greenland, be made of ice)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(greenland, be covered in ice)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(greenland, be covered with ice)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(greenland, be covered in ice)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(greenland, be made of ice)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(greenland, be covered in ice)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(greenland, be full of ice)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(greenland, be covered in ice)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(greenland, be full of ice)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(greenland, be covered in ice)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(greenland, is ice)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(greenland, be covered in ice)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(greenland, have ice)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(greenland, be covered in ice)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(greenland, have ice)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(greenland, be covered in ice)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(greenland, is ice)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(greenland, be covered in ice)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(greenland, be covered with ice)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(greenland, be covered in ice)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(greenland, be called ice)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(greenland, be covered in ice)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(greenland, be covered in ice covered in green)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(greenland, be covered in ice)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(greenland, be made of ice)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(greenland, be covered in ice)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(greenland, be called ice)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(greenland, be covered in ice)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(greenland, have ice)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(greenland, be covered in ice)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(greenland, be full of ice)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(greenland, be covered in ice)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(greenland, be covered in ice covered in green)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(greenland, be covered in ice)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(greenland, be covered with snow)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(greenland, be covered in ice)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(greenland, be covered with snow)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(greenland, be covered in ice)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(greenland, be full of ice)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(greenland, be covered in ice)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(greenland, have ice)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(greenland, be covered in ice)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(greenland, be covered with snow)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(greenland, be covered in ice)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(greenland, be covered with snow)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(greenland, be covered in ice)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(greenland, be covered in ice)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(greenland, be covered in ice)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(greenland, be covered in ice)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(greenland, be covered in ice)