greenland: have population density

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents island
Weight: 0.61
, land
Weight: 0.59
, place
Weight: 0.57
, region
Weight: 0.56
, area
Weight: 0.54
Siblings cayman islands
Weight: 0.35
, long island
Weight: 0.34
, rhode island
Weight: 0.34
, solomon islands
Weight: 0.34
, staten island
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
have population density 1.00
have low population density 0.97
have low population 0.87
have small population 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(place, have low population density) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(greenland, have population density)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(greenland, have population density) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(place, have low population density)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(greenland, have population density) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(place, have low population density)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(place, have low population density) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(greenland, have population density) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(greenland, have population density)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(greenland, have population density) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(greenland, have population density)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(greenland, have population density) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(greenland, have low population density)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(greenland, have population density) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(greenland, have low population density)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(greenland, have population density) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(greenland, have small population)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(greenland, have population density) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(greenland, have low population)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(greenland, have population density) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(greenland, have low population density)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(greenland, have population density) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(greenland, have population density) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(greenland, have population density)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(greenland, have population density) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(greenland, have population density)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(greenland, have population density) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(place, have low population density)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(greenland, have population density) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(place, have low population density)