grill: has physical part vents

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents restaurant
Weight: 0.69
, barbecue
Weight: 0.61
, seafood restaurant
Weight: 0.59
, thing
Weight: 0.57
Siblings italian restaurant
Weight: 0.36
, steakhouse
Weight: 0.36
, fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.36
, french restaurant
Weight: 0.35
, deli
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part vents 1.00
has physical part lids 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(barbecue, has physical part lids) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(grill, has physical part vents)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(grill, has physical part vents) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(barbecue, has physical part lids)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(grill, has physical part vents) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(barbecue, has physical part lids)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(barbecue, has physical part lids) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(grill, has physical part vents) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(grill, has physical part vents)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(grill, has physical part vents) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(grill, has physical part vents)

Similarity expansion

0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(grill, has physical part vents) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(grill, has physical part lids)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(grill, has physical part vents) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(grill, has physical part lids)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(grill, has physical part vents) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(grill, has physical part lids)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(grill, has physical part vents) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(grill, has physical part lids)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(grill, has physical part vents) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(grill, has physical part vents) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(grill, has physical part vents)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(grill, has physical part vents) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(grill, has physical part vents)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(grill, has physical part vents) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(barbecue, has physical part lids)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(grill, has physical part vents) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(barbecue, has physical part lids)