grilling: is healthy

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents topic
Weight: 0.52
, method
Weight: 0.51
, way
Weight: 0.44
, application
Weight: 0.41
Siblings cooking
Weight: 0.32
, fresh food
Weight: 0.30
, cold turkey
Weight: 0.30
, public speaking
Weight: 0.30
, waterboarding
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
is healthy 1.00
be considered healthy cooking 0.85
is healthier 0.85
be healthier home 0.82
is stable 0.76
is more stable 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(method, is stable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(grilling, is healthy)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(method, is more stable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(grilling, is healthy)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(grilling, is healthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(method, is more stable)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(grilling, is healthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(method, is stable)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(grilling, is healthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(method, is more stable)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(grilling, is healthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(method, is stable)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(grilling, is healthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(cooking, is healthy)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(grilling, is healthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(fresh food, is healthy)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(grilling, is healthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(cooking, be healthier home)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(grilling, is healthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(cooking, is healthier)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(grilling, is healthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(cooking, be considered healthy cooking)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(method, is stable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(grilling, is healthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(grilling, is healthy)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(method, is more stable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(grilling, is healthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(grilling, is healthy)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(grilling, is healthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(fresh food, is healthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(fresh food, is healthy)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(grilling, is healthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(cooking, is healthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(cooking, is healthy)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(grilling, is healthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(cooking, be considered healthy cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(cooking, be considered healthy cooking)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(grilling, is healthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(cooking, is healthier) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(cooking, is healthier)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(grilling, is healthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(cooking, be healthier home) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(cooking, be healthier home)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(grilling, is healthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(grilling, is healthy)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(grilling, is healthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(grilling, is healthier)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(grilling, is healthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(grilling, is healthier)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(grilling, is healthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(grilling, is healthier)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(grilling, is healthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(grilling, is healthier)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(grilling, is healthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(grilling, is healthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(grilling, is healthy)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(grilling, is healthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(grilling, is healthy)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(grilling, is healthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(method, is more stable)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(grilling, is healthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(method, is stable)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(grilling, is healthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(fresh food, is healthy)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(grilling, is healthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(cooking, be considered healthy cooking)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(grilling, is healthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(cooking, is healthy)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(grilling, is healthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(cooking, be healthier home)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(grilling, is healthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(cooking, is healthier)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(grilling, is healthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(method, is more stable)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(grilling, is healthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(method, is stable)