grocer: be at michigan

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents merchant
Weight: 0.61
, convenience store
Weight: 0.51
, shop
Weight: 0.50
, person
Weight: 0.45
, vendor
Weight: 0.44
Siblings supermarket
Weight: 0.35
, hardware store
Weight: 0.33
, food store
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at michigan 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(grocer, be at michigan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(food store, be at michigan)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(grocer, be at michigan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(food store, be at michigan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(food store, be at michigan)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(grocer, be at michigan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(grocer, be at michigan)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(grocer, be at michigan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(grocer, be at michigan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(grocer, be at michigan)

Typical implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(grocer, be at michigan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(grocer, be at michigan)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(grocer, be at michigan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(food store, be at michigan)