grocery: be expensive in hawaii

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents grocery store
Weight: 0.67
, convenience store
Weight: 0.65
, store shelf
Weight: 0.60
, shopping center
Weight: 0.58
, staple
Weight: 0.58
Siblings supermarket
Weight: 0.39
, food store
Weight: 0.38
, hardware store
Weight: 0.36
, shopping cart
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be expensive in hawaii 1.00
be in hawaii 0.95
be expensive in alaska 0.86
be expensive in seattle 0.83
be expensive in usa 0.83
be expensive in florida 0.83
be expensive in korea 0.80
be cheaper in europe 0.80
be expensive in nunavut 0.80
be in nunavut expensive 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(staple, be in hawaii) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(grocery, be expensive in hawaii)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(grocery, be expensive in hawaii) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(staple, be in hawaii)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.52
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(grocery, be expensive in hawaii) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(staple, be in hawaii)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(staple, be in hawaii) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(grocery, be expensive in hawaii) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(grocery, be expensive in hawaii)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(grocery, be expensive in hawaii) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(grocery, be expensive in hawaii)

Similarity expansion

0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(grocery, be expensive in hawaii) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(grocery, be in nunavut expensive)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(grocery, be expensive in hawaii) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(grocery, be in nunavut expensive)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(grocery, be expensive in hawaii) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(grocery, be in nunavut expensive)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(grocery, be expensive in hawaii) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(grocery, be expensive in seattle)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(grocery, be expensive in hawaii) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(grocery, be expensive in nunavut)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(grocery, be expensive in hawaii) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(grocery, be expensive in hawaii) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(grocery, be expensive in hawaii)

Typical implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(grocery, be expensive in hawaii) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(grocery, be expensive in hawaii)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(grocery, be expensive in hawaii) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(staple, be in hawaii)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(grocery, be expensive in hawaii) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(staple, be in hawaii)