groundhog: climb trees

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.72
, mammal
Weight: 0.61
, marmot
Weight: 0.60
, species
Weight: 0.54
Siblings rabbit
Weight: 0.37
, lizard
Weight: 0.36
, raccoon
Weight: 0.36
, squirrel
Weight: 0.36
, sasquatch
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
climb trees 1.00
chew on trees 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(groundhog, climb trees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(squirrel, climb trees)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(groundhog, climb trees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(squirrel, climb trees)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(groundhog, climb trees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(squirrel, climb trees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(squirrel, climb trees)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(groundhog, climb trees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(squirrel, climb trees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(squirrel, climb trees)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(groundhog, climb trees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(groundhog, climb trees)

Similarity expansion

0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(groundhog, climb trees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(groundhog, chew on trees)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(groundhog, climb trees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(groundhog, chew on trees)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(groundhog, climb trees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(groundhog, chew on trees)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(groundhog, climb trees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(groundhog, chew on trees)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(groundhog, climb trees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(groundhog, climb trees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(groundhog, climb trees)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(groundhog, climb trees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(groundhog, climb trees)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(groundhog, climb trees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(squirrel, climb trees)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(groundhog, climb trees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(squirrel, climb trees)