groundhog: chew on trees

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.72
, mammal
Weight: 0.61
, marmot
Weight: 0.60
, species
Weight: 0.54
Siblings rabbit
Weight: 0.37
, lizard
Weight: 0.36
, raccoon
Weight: 0.36
, squirrel
Weight: 0.36
, sasquatch
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
chew on trees 1.00
chew wood 0.89
chew on sticks 0.86
climb trees 0.80
eat wood 0.78
eat wires on cars 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(groundhog, chew on trees)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(squirrel, climb trees)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(groundhog, chew on trees)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(squirrel, climb trees)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(groundhog, chew on trees)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(rabbit, eat wood)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(groundhog, chew on trees)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(squirrel, eat wood)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(groundhog, chew on trees)
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(squirrel, climb trees)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(squirrel, climb trees)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(groundhog, chew on trees)
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(squirrel, climb trees)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(squirrel, climb trees)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(groundhog, chew on trees)
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(rabbit, eat wood)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(rabbit, eat wood)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(groundhog, chew on trees)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(squirrel, eat wood)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(squirrel, eat wood)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(groundhog, chew on trees)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(groundhog, chew on trees)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(groundhog, chew on trees)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(groundhog, chew wood)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(groundhog, chew on trees)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(groundhog, chew wood)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(groundhog, chew on trees)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(groundhog, chew wood)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(groundhog, chew on trees)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(groundhog, climb trees)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(groundhog, chew on trees)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(groundhog, climb trees)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(groundhog, chew on trees)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(groundhog, eat wood)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(groundhog, chew on trees)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(groundhog, eat wires on cars)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(groundhog, chew on trees)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(groundhog, eat wires on cars)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(groundhog, chew on trees)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(groundhog, eat wires on cars)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(groundhog, chew on trees)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(groundhog, eat wood)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(groundhog, chew on trees)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(groundhog, chew wood)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(groundhog, chew on trees)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(groundhog, chew on sticks)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(groundhog, chew on trees)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(groundhog, chew on sticks)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(groundhog, chew on trees)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(groundhog, climb trees)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(groundhog, chew on trees)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(groundhog, eat wood)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(groundhog, chew on trees)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(groundhog, eat wood)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(groundhog, chew on trees)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(groundhog, eat wires on cars)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(groundhog, chew on trees)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(groundhog, chew on sticks)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(groundhog, chew on trees)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(groundhog, chew on sticks)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(groundhog, chew on trees)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(groundhog, climb trees)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(groundhog, chew on trees)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(groundhog, chew on trees)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(groundhog, chew on trees)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(groundhog, chew on trees)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(groundhog, chew on trees)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(groundhog, chew on trees)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(squirrel, climb trees)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(groundhog, chew on trees)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(squirrel, climb trees)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(groundhog, chew on trees)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(rabbit, eat wood)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(groundhog, chew on trees)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(squirrel, eat wood)