growing: is fast bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents process
Weight: 0.52
, topic
Weight: 0.51
, organization
Weight: 0.44
, gardening
Weight: 0.42
, united states
Weight: 0.40
Siblings shrinking
Weight: 0.30
, evolution
Weight: 0.30
, trend
Weight: 0.30
, aging
Weight: 0.30
, fresh food
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
is fast bad 1.00
is too fast bad 0.94
is fast 0.94
has quality bad 0.77
is hard 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(process, is fast) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(growing, is fast bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(gardening, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(growing, is fast bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(growing, is fast bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(gardening, is hard)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(growing, is fast bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(process, is fast)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.51
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(growing, is fast bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(process, is fast)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(growing, is fast bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(gardening, is hard)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(growing, is fast bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(shrinking, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(growing, is fast bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(aging, is hard)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(process, is fast) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(growing, is fast bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(growing, is fast bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(gardening, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(growing, is fast bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(growing, is fast bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(growing, is fast bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(shrinking, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(shrinking, has quality bad)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(growing, is fast bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(aging, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(aging, is hard)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(growing, is fast bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(growing, is fast bad)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(growing, is fast bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(growing, is too fast bad)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(growing, is fast bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(growing, is too fast bad)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(growing, is fast bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(growing, is too fast bad)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(growing, is fast bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(growing, is too fast bad)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(growing, is fast bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(growing, has quality bad)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(growing, is fast bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(growing, has quality bad)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(growing, is fast bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(growing, has quality bad)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(growing, is fast bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(growing, has quality bad)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(growing, is fast bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(growing, is fast)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(growing, is fast bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(growing, is fast)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(growing, is fast bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(growing, is hard)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(growing, is fast bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(growing, is hard)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(growing, is fast bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(growing, is hard)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(growing, is fast bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(growing, is fast)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(growing, is fast bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(growing, is hard)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(growing, is fast bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(growing, is fast)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(growing, is fast bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(growing, is fast bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(growing, is fast bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(growing, is fast bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(growing, is fast bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(growing, is fast bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(process, is fast)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(growing, is fast bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(gardening, is hard)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(growing, is fast bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(shrinking, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(growing, is fast bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(aging, is hard)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(growing, is fast bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(gardening, is hard)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(growing, is fast bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(process, is fast)