habitat: has state degradation

Related concepts

Parents	factor Weight: 0.62 , activity Weight: 0.56 , structure Weight: 0.55 , charity Weight: 0.55
Siblings	grassland Weight: 0.73 , wetland Weight: 0.71 , pond Weight: 0.65 , freshwater Weight: 0.65 , marsh Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property	Similarity
has state degradation	1.00
affect process of erosion	0.78
contribute to soil erosion	0.78
has state fragmentation	0.77
reduce erosion	0.77
effect rate of soil erosion	0.76
affect rates of erosion	0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.88

Plausible(activity, effect rate of soil erosion) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Typical(habitat, has state degradation)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.71

Plausible(activity, contribute to soil erosion) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Typical(habitat, has state degradation)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.53

Plausible(activity, affect rates of erosion) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Typical(habitat, has state degradation)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.64

Plausible(habitat, has state degradation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Plausible(activity, affect rates of erosion)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.64

Plausible(habitat, has state degradation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Plausible(activity, contribute to soil erosion)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.64

Plausible(habitat, has state degradation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Plausible(activity, effect rate of soil erosion)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Remarkable(habitat, has state degradation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Remarkable(activity, contribute to soil erosion)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Remarkable(habitat, has state degradation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Remarkable(activity, effect rate of soil erosion)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Remarkable(habitat, has state degradation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Remarkable(activity, affect rates of erosion)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Remarkable(habitat, has state degradation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Remarkable(wetland, reduce erosion)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.88

Plausible(activity, effect rate of soil erosion) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

Remarkable(habitat, has state degradation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Plausible(habitat, has state degradation)

0.29

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.71

Plausible(activity, contribute to soil erosion) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

Remarkable(habitat, has state degradation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Plausible(habitat, has state degradation)

0.25

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.53

Plausible(activity, affect rates of erosion) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

Remarkable(habitat, has state degradation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Plausible(habitat, has state degradation)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.64

Plausible(habitat, has state degradation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

Remarkable(wetland, reduce erosion) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Plausible(wetland, reduce erosion)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.64

Plausible(habitat, has state degradation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Salient(habitat, has state degradation)

Similarity expansion

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.34

Remarkable(habitat, has state degradation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Remarkable(habitat, has state fragmentation)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.55

Salient(habitat, has state degradation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Salient(habitat, has state fragmentation)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.79

Typical(habitat, has state degradation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Typical(habitat, has state fragmentation)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.64

Plausible(habitat, has state degradation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Plausible(habitat, has state fragmentation)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.55

Salient(habitat, has state degradation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Typical(habitat, has state degradation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Remarkable(habitat, has state degradation)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.64

Plausible(habitat, has state degradation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Typical(habitat, has state degradation)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Remarkable(habitat, has state degradation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Typical(activity, contribute to soil erosion)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Remarkable(habitat, has state degradation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Typical(activity, affect rates of erosion)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Remarkable(habitat, has state degradation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Typical(activity, effect rate of soil erosion)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Remarkable(habitat, has state degradation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Typical(wetland, reduce erosion)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.79

Typical(habitat, has state degradation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Typical(activity, contribute to soil erosion)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.79

Typical(habitat, has state degradation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Typical(activity, affect rates of erosion)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.79

Typical(habitat, has state degradation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Typical(activity, effect rate of soil erosion)