hacker: do ddos attacks

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents criminal
Weight: 0.63
, outsider
Weight: 0.63
, person
Weight: 0.57
, third party
Weight: 0.57
, individual
Weight: 0.55
Siblings spammer
Weight: 0.33
, pickpocket
Weight: 0.32
, terrorist
Weight: 0.32
, thief
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
do ddos attacks 1.00
use attacks 0.96
attack 0.86
commit cyber attacks 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(hacker, do ddos attacks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(terrorist, attack)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(hacker, do ddos attacks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(terrorist, attack) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(terrorist, attack)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(hacker, do ddos attacks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(hacker, do ddos attacks)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(hacker, do ddos attacks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(hacker, use attacks)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(hacker, do ddos attacks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(hacker, use attacks)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(hacker, do ddos attacks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(hacker, attack)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(hacker, do ddos attacks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(hacker, attack)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(hacker, do ddos attacks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(hacker, attack)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(hacker, do ddos attacks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(hacker, do ddos attacks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(hacker, do ddos attacks)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(hacker, do ddos attacks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(hacker, do ddos attacks)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(hacker, do ddos attacks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(terrorist, attack)