hacking: is easy

Related concepts

Parents	crime Weight: 0.63 , computer network Weight: 0.57 , activity Weight: 0.57 , thing Weight: 0.55 , breach Weight: 0.53
Siblings	computer virus Weight: 0.35 , hack Weight: 0.33 , stealing Weight: 0.32 , sexual harassment Weight: 0.32 , piracy Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property	Similarity
is easy	1.00
be easy	0.99
seem easier	0.83
is hard	0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.99

Plausible(thing, is hard) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Typical(hacking, is easy)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.94

Plausible(computer network, is hard) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Typical(hacking, is easy)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.62

Plausible(crime, is hard) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Typical(hacking, is easy)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.73

Plausible(hacking, is easy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Plausible(crime, is hard)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.73

Plausible(hacking, is easy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Plausible(computer network, is hard)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.73

Plausible(hacking, is easy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Plausible(thing, is hard)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.26

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(hacking, is easy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Remarkable(computer network, is hard)

0.21

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(hacking, is easy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(crime, is hard)

0.15

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(hacking, is easy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Remarkable(thing, is hard)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(hacking, is easy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Remarkable(stealing, is easy)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(hacking, is easy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Remarkable(hack, is hard)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(hacking, is easy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(piracy, is hard)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.99

Plausible(thing, is hard) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

Remarkable(hacking, is easy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Plausible(hacking, is easy)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.94

Plausible(computer network, is hard) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

Remarkable(hacking, is easy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Plausible(hacking, is easy)

0.29

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.62

Plausible(crime, is hard) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

Remarkable(hacking, is easy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Plausible(hacking, is easy)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.73

Plausible(hacking, is easy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

Remarkable(stealing, is easy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Plausible(stealing, is easy)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.73

Plausible(hacking, is easy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

Remarkable(piracy, is hard) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Plausible(piracy, is hard)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.73

Plausible(hacking, is easy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

Remarkable(hack, is hard) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Plausible(hack, is hard)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.73

Plausible(hacking, is easy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Salient(hacking, is easy)

Similarity expansion

0.73

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.99

Evidence: 0.82

Salient(hacking, is easy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Salient(hacking, be easy)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.99

Evidence: 0.68

Remarkable(hacking, is easy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Remarkable(hacking, be easy)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.99

Evidence: 0.73

Plausible(hacking, is easy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Plausible(hacking, be easy)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.99

Evidence: 0.74

Typical(hacking, is easy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Typical(hacking, be easy)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.74

Typical(hacking, is easy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Typical(hacking, seem easier)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.82

Salient(hacking, is easy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Salient(hacking, seem easier)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.73

Plausible(hacking, is easy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Plausible(hacking, seem easier)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.82

Salient(hacking, is easy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Salient(hacking, is hard)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.68

Remarkable(hacking, is easy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(hacking, seem easier)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.74

Typical(hacking, is easy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Typical(hacking, is hard)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.73

Plausible(hacking, is easy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Plausible(hacking, is hard)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.68

Remarkable(hacking, is easy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(hacking, is hard)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.82

Salient(hacking, is easy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Typical(hacking, is easy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(hacking, is easy)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.73

Plausible(hacking, is easy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Typical(hacking, is easy)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.23

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(hacking, is easy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Typical(crime, is hard)

0.13

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(hacking, is easy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Typical(computer network, is hard)

0.13

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(hacking, is easy) ⋁

Evidence: 1.00

¬ Typical(thing, is hard)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(hacking, is easy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Typical(stealing, is easy)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(hacking, is easy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Typical(piracy, is hard)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(hacking, is easy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Typical(hack, is hard)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.74

Typical(hacking, is easy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Typical(crime, is hard)

0.27

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.74

Typical(hacking, is easy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Typical(computer network, is hard)

0.27

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.74

Typical(hacking, is easy) ⋁

Evidence: 1.00

¬ Typical(thing, is hard)