hacking: is hard

Related concepts

Parents	crime Weight: 0.63 , computer network Weight: 0.57 , activity Weight: 0.57 , thing Weight: 0.55 , breach Weight: 0.53
Siblings	computer virus Weight: 0.35 , hack Weight: 0.33 , stealing Weight: 0.32 , sexual harassment Weight: 0.32 , piracy Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property	Similarity
is hard	1.00
be hard in fallout 4	0.76
is easy	0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.66

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.99

Plausible(thing, is hard) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Typical(hacking, is hard)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.94

Plausible(computer network, is hard) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Typical(hacking, is hard)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.62

Plausible(crime, is hard) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Typical(hacking, is hard)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.79

Plausible(hacking, is hard) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Plausible(crime, is hard)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.79

Plausible(hacking, is hard) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Plausible(computer network, is hard)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.79

Plausible(hacking, is hard) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Plausible(thing, is hard)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.33

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(hacking, is hard) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Remarkable(computer network, is hard)

0.25

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(hacking, is hard) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(crime, is hard)

0.17

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(hacking, is hard) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Remarkable(thing, is hard)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(hacking, is hard) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Remarkable(stealing, is easy)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(hacking, is hard) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Remarkable(hack, is hard)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(hacking, is hard) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(piracy, is hard)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.99

Plausible(thing, is hard) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

Remarkable(hacking, is hard) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Plausible(hacking, is hard)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.94

Plausible(computer network, is hard) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

Remarkable(hacking, is hard) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Plausible(hacking, is hard)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.62

Plausible(crime, is hard) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

Remarkable(hacking, is hard) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Plausible(hacking, is hard)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.79

Plausible(hacking, is hard) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

Remarkable(piracy, is hard) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Plausible(piracy, is hard)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.79

Plausible(hacking, is hard) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

Remarkable(hack, is hard) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Plausible(hack, is hard)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.79

Plausible(hacking, is hard) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

Remarkable(stealing, is easy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Plausible(stealing, is easy)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.79

Plausible(hacking, is hard) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Salient(hacking, is hard)

Similarity expansion

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.89

Salient(hacking, is hard) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Salient(hacking, is easy)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.89

Salient(hacking, is hard) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Salient(hacking, be hard in fallout 4)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.73

Remarkable(hacking, is hard) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Remarkable(hacking, be hard in fallout 4)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.79

Plausible(hacking, is hard) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Plausible(hacking, is easy)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.79

Typical(hacking, is hard) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Typical(hacking, is easy)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.73

Remarkable(hacking, is hard) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(hacking, is easy)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.79

Plausible(hacking, is hard) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Plausible(hacking, be hard in fallout 4)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.79

Typical(hacking, is hard) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Typical(hacking, be hard in fallout 4)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.89

Salient(hacking, is hard) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Typical(hacking, is hard) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(hacking, is hard)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.79

Plausible(hacking, is hard) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Typical(hacking, is hard)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(hacking, is hard) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Typical(crime, is hard)

0.15

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(hacking, is hard) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Typical(computer network, is hard)

0.14

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(hacking, is hard) ⋁

Evidence: 1.00

¬ Typical(thing, is hard)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(hacking, is hard) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Typical(piracy, is hard)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(hacking, is hard) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Typical(stealing, is easy)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(hacking, is hard) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Typical(hack, is hard)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.79

Typical(hacking, is hard) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Typical(crime, is hard)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.79

Typical(hacking, is hard) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Typical(computer network, is hard)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.79

Typical(hacking, is hard) ⋁

Evidence: 1.00

¬ Typical(thing, is hard)