hail: be associated with air

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents storm
Weight: 0.55
, event
Weight: 0.52
, element
Weight: 0.52
, thing
Weight: 0.51
, weather
Weight: 0.49
Siblings tornado
Weight: 0.32
, thunderstorm
Weight: 0.32
, rain
Weight: 0.31
, dust storm
Weight: 0.31
, bad weather
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
be associated with air 1.00
be associated with unstable air 0.89
be associated with highly unstable air 0.85
be related 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(weather, be related)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(hail, be associated with air)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(hail, be associated with air)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(weather, be related)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(hail, be associated with air)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(weather, be related)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(hail, be associated with air)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(thunderstorm, be related)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(weather, be related)
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(hail, be associated with air)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(hail, be associated with air)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(hail, be associated with air)
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(thunderstorm, be related)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(thunderstorm, be related)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(hail, be associated with air)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(hail, be associated with air)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(hail, be associated with air)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(hail, be associated with unstable air)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(hail, be associated with air)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(hail, be associated with unstable air)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(hail, be associated with air)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(hail, be associated with highly unstable air)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(hail, be associated with air)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(hail, be associated with unstable air)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(hail, be associated with air)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(hail, be associated with unstable air)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(hail, be associated with air)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(hail, be related)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(hail, be associated with air)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(hail, be associated with highly unstable air)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(hail, be associated with air)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(hail, be associated with highly unstable air)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(hail, be associated with air)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(hail, be associated with highly unstable air)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(hail, be associated with air)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(hail, be related)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(hail, be associated with air)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(hail, be related)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(hail, be associated with air)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(hail, be related)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(hail, be associated with air)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(hail, be associated with air)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(hail, be associated with air)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(hail, be associated with air)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(hail, be associated with air)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(hail, be associated with air)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(weather, be related)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(hail, be associated with air)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(thunderstorm, be related)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(hail, be associated with air)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(weather, be related)