hail: be related

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents storm
Weight: 0.55
, event
Weight: 0.52
, element
Weight: 0.52
, thing
Weight: 0.51
, weather
Weight: 0.49
Siblings tornado
Weight: 0.32
, thunderstorm
Weight: 0.32
, rain
Weight: 0.31
, dust storm
Weight: 0.31
, bad weather
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
be related 1.00
be associated with air 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(weather, be related)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(hail, be related)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(hail, be related)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(weather, be related)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(hail, be related)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(weather, be related)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(hail, be related)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(thunderstorm, be related)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(weather, be related)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(hail, be related)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(hail, be related)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(hail, be related)
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(thunderstorm, be related)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(thunderstorm, be related)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(hail, be related)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(hail, be related)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(hail, be related)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(hail, be associated with air)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(hail, be related)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(hail, be associated with air)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(hail, be related)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(hail, be associated with air)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(hail, be related)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(hail, be associated with air)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(hail, be related)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(hail, be related)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(hail, be related)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(hail, be related)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(hail, be related)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(hail, be related)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(weather, be related)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(hail, be related)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(thunderstorm, be related)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(hail, be related)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(weather, be related)