hairdresser: has physical part hair

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents service
Weight: 0.61
, woman
Weight: 0.59
, job
Weight: 0.58
, business
Weight: 0.53
Siblings barber
Weight: 0.35
, old woman
Weight: 0.35
, salon
Weight: 0.35
, barber shop
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part hair 1.00
texturize hair 0.89
have bad hair 0.88
hate long hair 0.86
hate hair 0.86
charge more for long hair 0.85
charge more for hair 0.85
burn hair 0.82
wash hair 0.80
cut too short hair 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.66
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(woman, has physical part hair)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(hairdresser, has physical part hair)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(hairdresser, has physical part hair)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(woman, has physical part hair)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.02
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.03
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(hairdresser, has physical part hair)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(woman, has physical part hair)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(hairdresser, has physical part hair)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(barber, burn hair)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(hairdresser, has physical part hair)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(barber, cut too short hair)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(hairdresser, has physical part hair)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(old woman, has physical part hair)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(woman, has physical part hair)
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(hairdresser, has physical part hair)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(hairdresser, has physical part hair)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(hairdresser, has physical part hair)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(old woman, has physical part hair)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(old woman, has physical part hair)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(hairdresser, has physical part hair)
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(barber, burn hair)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(barber, burn hair)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(hairdresser, has physical part hair)
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(barber, cut too short hair)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(barber, cut too short hair)

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(hairdresser, has physical part hair)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(hairdresser, has physical part hair)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(hairdresser, has physical part hair)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(hairdresser, texturize hair)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(hairdresser, has physical part hair)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(hairdresser, have bad hair)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(hairdresser, has physical part hair)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(hairdresser, hate long hair)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(hairdresser, has physical part hair)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(hairdresser, hate hair)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(hairdresser, has physical part hair)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(hairdresser, charge more for long hair)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(hairdresser, has physical part hair)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(hairdresser, charge more for hair)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(hairdresser, has physical part hair)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(hairdresser, hate long hair)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(hairdresser, has physical part hair)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(hairdresser, hate hair)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(hairdresser, has physical part hair)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(hairdresser, burn hair)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(hairdresser, has physical part hair)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(hairdresser, hate long hair)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(hairdresser, has physical part hair)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(hairdresser, wash hair)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(hairdresser, has physical part hair)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(hairdresser, hate hair)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(hairdresser, has physical part hair)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(hairdresser, cut too short hair)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(hairdresser, has physical part hair)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(hairdresser, wash hair)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(hairdresser, has physical part hair)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(hairdresser, wash hair)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(hairdresser, has physical part hair)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(hairdresser, burn hair)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(hairdresser, has physical part hair)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(hairdresser, have bad hair)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(hairdresser, has physical part hair)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(hairdresser, hate long hair)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(hairdresser, has physical part hair)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(hairdresser, texturize hair)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(hairdresser, has physical part hair)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(hairdresser, wash hair)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(hairdresser, has physical part hair)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(hairdresser, hate hair)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(hairdresser, has physical part hair)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(hairdresser, burn hair)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(hairdresser, has physical part hair)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(hairdresser, charge more for hair)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(hairdresser, has physical part hair)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(hairdresser, cut too short hair)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(hairdresser, has physical part hair)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(hairdresser, charge more for long hair)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(hairdresser, has physical part hair)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(hairdresser, have bad hair)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(hairdresser, has physical part hair)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(hairdresser, texturize hair)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(hairdresser, has physical part hair)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(hairdresser, charge more for hair)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(hairdresser, has physical part hair)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(hairdresser, burn hair)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(hairdresser, has physical part hair)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(hairdresser, cut too short hair)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(hairdresser, has physical part hair)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(hairdresser, charge more for long hair)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(hairdresser, has physical part hair)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(hairdresser, texturize hair)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(hairdresser, has physical part hair)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(hairdresser, charge more for hair)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(hairdresser, has physical part hair)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(hairdresser, have bad hair)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(hairdresser, has physical part hair)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(hairdresser, cut too short hair)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(hairdresser, has physical part hair)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(hairdresser, charge more for long hair)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(hairdresser, has physical part hair)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(hairdresser, has physical part hair)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(hairdresser, has physical part hair)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(hairdresser, has physical part hair)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(hairdresser, has physical part hair)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.01
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.03
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(hairdresser, has physical part hair)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(woman, has physical part hair)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(hairdresser, has physical part hair)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(old woman, has physical part hair)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(hairdresser, has physical part hair)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(barber, burn hair)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(hairdresser, has physical part hair)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(barber, cut too short hair)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.06
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(hairdresser, has physical part hair)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(woman, has physical part hair)