hairdresser: have bad hair

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents service
Weight: 0.61
, woman
Weight: 0.59
, job
Weight: 0.58
, business
Weight: 0.53
Siblings barber
Weight: 0.35
, old woman
Weight: 0.35
, salon
Weight: 0.35
, barber shop
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
have bad hair 1.00
texturize hair 0.92
hate hair 0.92
hate long hair 0.91
has physical part hair 0.88
charge more for long hair 0.85
cut hair wet 0.85
charge more for hair 0.85
cut too short hair 0.85
cut hair dry 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(woman, has physical part hair)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(hairdresser, have bad hair)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(hairdresser, have bad hair)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(woman, has physical part hair)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(hairdresser, have bad hair)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(woman, has physical part hair)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(hairdresser, have bad hair)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(barber, cut hair wet)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(hairdresser, have bad hair)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(barber, cut too short hair)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(hairdresser, have bad hair)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(old woman, has physical part hair)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(woman, has physical part hair)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(hairdresser, have bad hair)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(hairdresser, have bad hair)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(hairdresser, have bad hair)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(old woman, has physical part hair)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(old woman, has physical part hair)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(hairdresser, have bad hair)
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(barber, cut hair wet)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(barber, cut hair wet)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(hairdresser, have bad hair)
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(barber, cut too short hair)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(barber, cut too short hair)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(hairdresser, have bad hair)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(hairdresser, have bad hair)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(hairdresser, have bad hair)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(hairdresser, hate long hair)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(hairdresser, have bad hair)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(hairdresser, hate long hair)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(hairdresser, have bad hair)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(hairdresser, hate hair)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(hairdresser, have bad hair)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(hairdresser, hate hair)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(hairdresser, have bad hair)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(hairdresser, hate long hair)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(hairdresser, have bad hair)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(hairdresser, hate hair)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(hairdresser, have bad hair)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(hairdresser, has physical part hair)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(hairdresser, have bad hair)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(hairdresser, hate long hair)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(hairdresser, have bad hair)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(hairdresser, hate hair)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(hairdresser, have bad hair)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(hairdresser, has physical part hair)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(hairdresser, have bad hair)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(hairdresser, texturize hair)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(hairdresser, have bad hair)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(hairdresser, has physical part hair)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(hairdresser, have bad hair)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(hairdresser, texturize hair)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(hairdresser, have bad hair)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(hairdresser, texturize hair)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(hairdresser, have bad hair)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(hairdresser, cut hair wet)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(hairdresser, have bad hair)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(hairdresser, charge more for hair)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(hairdresser, have bad hair)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(hairdresser, cut hair dry)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(hairdresser, have bad hair)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(hairdresser, cut hair wet)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(hairdresser, have bad hair)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(hairdresser, cut too short hair)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(hairdresser, have bad hair)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(hairdresser, cut hair dry)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(hairdresser, have bad hair)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(hairdresser, cut too short hair)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(hairdresser, have bad hair)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(hairdresser, charge more for hair)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(hairdresser, have bad hair)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(hairdresser, charge more for long hair)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(hairdresser, have bad hair)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(hairdresser, cut hair wet)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(hairdresser, have bad hair)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(hairdresser, charge more for long hair)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(hairdresser, have bad hair)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(hairdresser, cut hair dry)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(hairdresser, have bad hair)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(hairdresser, cut too short hair)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(hairdresser, have bad hair)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(hairdresser, charge more for hair)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(hairdresser, have bad hair)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(hairdresser, cut hair wet)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(hairdresser, have bad hair)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(hairdresser, cut hair dry)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(hairdresser, have bad hair)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(hairdresser, charge more for long hair)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(hairdresser, have bad hair)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(hairdresser, texturize hair)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(hairdresser, have bad hair)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(hairdresser, charge more for long hair)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(hairdresser, have bad hair)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(hairdresser, cut too short hair)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(hairdresser, have bad hair)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(hairdresser, charge more for hair)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(hairdresser, have bad hair)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(hairdresser, has physical part hair)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(hairdresser, have bad hair)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(hairdresser, have bad hair)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(hairdresser, have bad hair)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(hairdresser, have bad hair)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(hairdresser, have bad hair)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(hairdresser, have bad hair)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(woman, has physical part hair)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(hairdresser, have bad hair)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(old woman, has physical part hair)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(hairdresser, have bad hair)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(barber, cut too short hair)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(hairdresser, have bad hair)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(barber, cut hair wet)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(hairdresser, have bad hair)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(woman, has physical part hair)