hairdresser: has quality bad

Related concepts

Parents	service Weight: 0.61 , woman Weight: 0.59 , job Weight: 0.58 , business Weight: 0.53
Siblings	barber Weight: 0.35 , old woman Weight: 0.35 , salon Weight: 0.35 , barber shop Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property	Similarity
has quality bad	1.00
has quality good	0.96
has quality questions	0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.80

Plausible(service, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Typical(hairdresser, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.70

Plausible(hairdresser, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Plausible(service, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.26

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(hairdresser, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(service, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(hairdresser, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Remarkable(barber shop, has quality bad)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(hairdresser, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Remarkable(salon, has quality bad)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(hairdresser, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Remarkable(barber, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.80

Plausible(service, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

Remarkable(hairdresser, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Plausible(hairdresser, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.70

Plausible(hairdresser, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

Remarkable(salon, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Plausible(salon, has quality bad)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.70

Plausible(hairdresser, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

Remarkable(barber, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Plausible(barber, has quality good)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.70

Plausible(hairdresser, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

Remarkable(barber shop, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Plausible(barber shop, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.70

Plausible(hairdresser, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Salient(hairdresser, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.79

Salient(hairdresser, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Salient(hairdresser, has quality good)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.74

Typical(hairdresser, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Typical(hairdresser, has quality good)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.70

Plausible(hairdresser, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Plausible(hairdresser, has quality good)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.66

Remarkable(hairdresser, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Remarkable(hairdresser, has quality good)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.74

Typical(hairdresser, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Typical(hairdresser, has quality questions)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.79

Salient(hairdresser, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Salient(hairdresser, has quality questions)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.70

Plausible(hairdresser, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Plausible(hairdresser, has quality questions)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.66

Remarkable(hairdresser, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Remarkable(hairdresser, has quality questions)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.79

Salient(hairdresser, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Typical(hairdresser, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(hairdresser, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.70

Plausible(hairdresser, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Typical(hairdresser, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.24

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(hairdresser, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Typical(service, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(hairdresser, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Typical(barber, has quality good)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(hairdresser, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Typical(barber shop, has quality bad)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(hairdresser, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Typical(salon, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.74

Typical(hairdresser, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Typical(service, has quality good)