service: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents escort service
Weight: 0.87
, postal service
Weight: 0.82
, honor
Weight: 0.62
, delivery
Weight: 0.58
Siblings service station
Weight: 0.85
, internet service provider
Weight: 0.83
, bar service
Weight: 0.72
, public transport
Weight: 0.71
, health insurance
Weight: 0.68

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
has quality better 0.94
is quality 0.91
has quality right 0.90
has quality worth 0.85
be bad in bulgaria 0.77
be bad for environment 0.77
be bad in us 0.76
be better for environment 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(delivery, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(service, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(delivery, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(service, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(service, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(delivery, has quality better)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(service, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(delivery, has quality worth)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(service, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(delivery, has quality better)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(service, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(delivery, has quality worth)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(service, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(health insurance, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(service, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(public transport, be bad for environment)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(service, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(public transport, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(service, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(public transport, be bad in us)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(service, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(health insurance, has quality right)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(service, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(public transport, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(service, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(health insurance, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(service, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(public transport, be better for environment)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(delivery, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(service, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(service, has quality good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(delivery, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(service, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(service, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(service, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(health insurance, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(health insurance, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(service, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(public transport, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(public transport, has quality good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(service, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(health insurance, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(health insurance, has quality bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(service, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(public transport, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(public transport, has quality bad)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(service, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(health insurance, has quality right) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(health insurance, has quality right)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(service, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(public transport, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(public transport, be bad for environment)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(service, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(public transport, be better for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(public transport, be better for environment)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(service, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(public transport, be bad in us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(public transport, be bad in us)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(service, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(service, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(service, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(service, is quality)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(service, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(service, is quality)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(service, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(service, is quality)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(service, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(service, is quality)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(service, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(service, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(service, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(service, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(service, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(service, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(delivery, has quality worth)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(service, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(delivery, has quality better)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(service, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(health insurance, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(service, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(public transport, be bad for environment)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(service, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(health insurance, has quality right)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(service, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(public transport, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(service, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(public transport, be bad in us)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(service, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(public transport, be better for environment)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(service, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(health insurance, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(service, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(public transport, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(service, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(delivery, has quality better)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(service, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(delivery, has quality worth)