public transport: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents service
Weight: 0.71
, sector
Weight: 0.71
, project
Weight: 0.65
, issue
Weight: 0.64
, facility
Weight: 0.64
Siblings bus stop
Weight: 0.67
, air travel
Weight: 0.66
, mrt
Weight: 0.47
, postal service
Weight: 0.37
, escort service
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
is quality 0.87
be bad in bulgaria 0.87
has quality news 0.80
be bad for environment 0.80
be bad in us 0.80
is terrible 0.77
be in bad weather 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(service, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(public transport, has quality bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(sector, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(public transport, has quality bad)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(project, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(public transport, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(service, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(public transport, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(sector, has quality news) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(public transport, has quality bad)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(project, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(public transport, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(public transport, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(project, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(public transport, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(project, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(public transport, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(sector, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(public transport, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(service, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(public transport, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(service, is quality)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(public transport, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(sector, has quality news)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.55
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(public transport, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(project, has quality bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(public transport, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(project, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(public transport, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(sector, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(public transport, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(service, has quality good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(public transport, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(service, is quality)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(public transport, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(sector, has quality news)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(public transport, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(air travel, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(public transport, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(air travel, be bad for environment)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(public transport, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(air travel, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(public transport, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(mrt, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(public transport, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(air travel, is terrible)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(service, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(public transport, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(public transport, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(sector, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(public transport, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(public transport, has quality bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(project, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(public transport, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(public transport, has quality bad)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(service, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(public transport, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(public transport, has quality bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(sector, has quality news) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(public transport, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(public transport, has quality bad)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(project, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(public transport, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(public transport, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(public transport, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(mrt, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(mrt, has quality good)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(public transport, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(air travel, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(air travel, has quality good)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(public transport, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(air travel, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(air travel, has quality bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(public transport, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(air travel, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(air travel, be bad for environment)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(public transport, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(air travel, is terrible) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(air travel, is terrible)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(public transport, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(public transport, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(public transport, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(public transport, has quality good)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(public transport, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(public transport, be bad for environment)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(public transport, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(public transport, be bad for environment)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(public transport, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(public transport, be bad for environment)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(public transport, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(public transport, be bad for environment)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(public transport, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(public transport, be bad in us)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(public transport, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(public transport, be bad in us)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(public transport, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(public transport, be bad in us)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(public transport, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(public transport, be bad in us)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(public transport, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(public transport, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(public transport, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(public transport, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(public transport, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(public transport, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(public transport, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(public transport, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(public transport, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(public transport, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(public transport, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(public transport, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(project, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(public transport, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(project, has quality good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(public transport, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(service, has quality good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(public transport, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(sector, has quality good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(public transport, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(service, is quality)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(public transport, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(sector, has quality news)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(public transport, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(mrt, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(public transport, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(air travel, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(public transport, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(air travel, be bad for environment)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(public transport, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(air travel, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(public transport, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(air travel, is terrible)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(public transport, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(project, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(public transport, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(project, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(public transport, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(service, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(public transport, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(sector, has quality good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(public transport, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(service, is quality)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(public transport, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(sector, has quality news)