air travel: be bad for environment

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents travel
Weight: 0.68
, service
Weight: 0.67
, public transport
Weight: 0.66
, cost
Weight: 0.62
, airport
Weight: 0.62
Siblings travel agency
Weight: 0.39
, travel agent
Weight: 0.38
, air ticket
Weight: 0.36
, flight
Weight: 0.35
, escort service
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad for environment 1.00
has quality bad 0.80
pollute environment 0.78
has quality good 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(public transport, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(air travel, be bad for environment)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(service, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(air travel, be bad for environment)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(airport, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(air travel, be bad for environment)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(travel, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(air travel, be bad for environment)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(public transport, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(air travel, be bad for environment)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(public transport, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(air travel, be bad for environment)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(air travel, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(public transport, be bad for environment)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(air travel, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(public transport, has quality bad)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(air travel, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(travel, has quality good)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(air travel, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(airport, has quality good)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(air travel, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(service, has quality good)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(air travel, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(public transport, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.57
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(air travel, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(public transport, be bad for environment)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(air travel, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(public transport, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(air travel, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(public transport, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(air travel, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(airport, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(air travel, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(service, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(air travel, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(travel, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(public transport, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(air travel, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(air travel, be bad for environment)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(public transport, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(air travel, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(air travel, be bad for environment)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(public transport, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(air travel, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(air travel, be bad for environment)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(service, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(air travel, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(air travel, be bad for environment)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(airport, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(air travel, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(air travel, be bad for environment)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(travel, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(air travel, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(air travel, be bad for environment)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(air travel, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(air travel, be bad for environment)

Similarity expansion

0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(air travel, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(air travel, has quality bad)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(air travel, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(air travel, has quality bad)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(air travel, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(air travel, has quality good)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(air travel, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(air travel, has quality good)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(air travel, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(air travel, has quality bad)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(air travel, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(air travel, has quality bad)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(air travel, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(air travel, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(air travel, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(air travel, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(air travel, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(air travel, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(air travel, be bad for environment)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(air travel, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(air travel, be bad for environment)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(air travel, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(public transport, be bad for environment)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(air travel, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(public transport, has quality bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(air travel, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(travel, has quality good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(air travel, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(service, has quality good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(air travel, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(airport, has quality good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(air travel, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(public transport, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(air travel, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(public transport, be bad for environment)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(air travel, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(travel, has quality good)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(air travel, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(public transport, has quality bad)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(air travel, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(service, has quality good)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(air travel, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(airport, has quality good)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(air travel, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(public transport, has quality good)