ham: be processed

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents lunch meat
Weight: 0.69
, cheese
Weight: 0.59
, recipe
Weight: 0.58
, staple
Weight: 0.58
, favorite
Weight: 0.58
Siblings spaghetti sauce
Weight: 0.35
, cream cheese
Weight: 0.34
, salami
Weight: 0.34
, cheddar
Weight: 0.34
, sausage
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be processed 1.00
is processed 1.00
be processed meat 0.92
is processed meat 0.91
be considered processed meat 0.91
be transported 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.08
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(ham, be processed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(sausage, be processed meat)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(ham, be processed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(sausage, be processed meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(sausage, be processed meat)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(ham, be processed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(ham, be processed)

Similarity expansion

0.83
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(ham, be processed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(ham, is processed)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(ham, be processed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(ham, is processed)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(ham, be processed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(ham, be processed meat)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(ham, be processed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(ham, is processed meat)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(ham, be processed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(ham, be considered processed meat)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(ham, be processed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(ham, be processed meat)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(ham, be processed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(ham, be considered processed meat)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(ham, be processed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(ham, is processed meat)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(ham, be processed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(ham, is processed)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(ham, be processed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(ham, be processed meat)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(ham, be processed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(ham, is processed meat)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(ham, be processed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(ham, be considered processed meat)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(ham, be processed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(ham, be considered processed meat)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(ham, be processed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(ham, is processed)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(ham, be processed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(ham, is processed meat)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(ham, be processed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(ham, be processed meat)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(ham, be processed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(ham, be processed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(ham, be processed)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(ham, be processed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(ham, be processed)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(ham, be processed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(sausage, be processed meat)