hamburger: be at burger king

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents meat
Weight: 0.72
, meal
Weight: 0.71
, food
Weight: 0.67
, fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.66
, sausage
Weight: 0.65
Siblings cheeseburger
Weight: 0.38
, sandwich
Weight: 0.37
, pizza
Weight: 0.37
, soup
Weight: 0.37
, chicken
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at burger king 1.00
be used to hamburger 0.81
be at ham sandwich 0.78
be at pizza 0.78
be at pizza store 0.76
be find in steak hous 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(sausage, be at pizza) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(hamburger, be at burger king)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(meat, be at ham sandwich) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(hamburger, be at burger king)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(meat, be find in steak hous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(hamburger, be at burger king)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(food, be at pizza) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(hamburger, be at burger king)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(fast food restaurant, be used to hamburger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(hamburger, be at burger king)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(hamburger, be at burger king) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(fast food restaurant, be used to hamburger)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(hamburger, be at burger king) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(food, be at pizza)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(hamburger, be at burger king) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(meat, be find in steak hous)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(hamburger, be at burger king) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(meat, be at ham sandwich)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(hamburger, be at burger king) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(sausage, be at pizza)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(hamburger, be at burger king) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(meat, be at ham sandwich)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(hamburger, be at burger king) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(meat, be find in steak hous)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(hamburger, be at burger king) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(sausage, be at pizza)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(hamburger, be at burger king) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(food, be at pizza)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(hamburger, be at burger king) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be used to hamburger)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(hamburger, be at burger king) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(chicken, be at pizza)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(hamburger, be at burger king) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(pizza, be at pizza store)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(fast food restaurant, be used to hamburger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(hamburger, be at burger king) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(hamburger, be at burger king)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(sausage, be at pizza) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(hamburger, be at burger king) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(hamburger, be at burger king)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(meat, be at ham sandwich) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(hamburger, be at burger king) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(hamburger, be at burger king)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(food, be at pizza) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(hamburger, be at burger king) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(hamburger, be at burger king)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(meat, be find in steak hous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(hamburger, be at burger king) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(hamburger, be at burger king)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(hamburger, be at burger king) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(pizza, be at pizza store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(pizza, be at pizza store)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(hamburger, be at burger king) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(chicken, be at pizza) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(chicken, be at pizza)

Salient implies Plausible

0.15
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(hamburger, be at burger king) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(hamburger, be at burger king)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(hamburger, be at burger king) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(hamburger, be at pizza)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(hamburger, be at burger king) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(hamburger, be at pizza)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(hamburger, be at burger king) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(hamburger, be at pizza)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(hamburger, be at burger king) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(hamburger, be at pizza)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(hamburger, be at burger king) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(hamburger, be at burger king) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(hamburger, be at burger king)

Typical implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(hamburger, be at burger king) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(hamburger, be at burger king)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(hamburger, be at burger king) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(sausage, be at pizza)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(hamburger, be at burger king) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, be used to hamburger)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(hamburger, be at burger king) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(meat, be at ham sandwich)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(hamburger, be at burger king) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(food, be at pizza)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(hamburger, be at burger king) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(meat, be find in steak hous)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(hamburger, be at burger king) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(pizza, be at pizza store)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(hamburger, be at burger king) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(chicken, be at pizza)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(hamburger, be at burger king) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(sausage, be at pizza)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(hamburger, be at burger king) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, be used to hamburger)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(hamburger, be at burger king) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(meat, be at ham sandwich)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(hamburger, be at burger king) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(food, be at pizza)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(hamburger, be at burger king) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(meat, be find in steak hous)