meat: be at ham sandwich

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dairy product
Weight: 0.65
, food
Weight: 0.65
, fast food
Weight: 0.63
, raw material
Weight: 0.63
, item
Weight: 0.63
Siblings hamburger
Weight: 0.72
, lamb
Weight: 0.71
, beef
Weight: 0.69
, pork
Weight: 0.68
, tofu
Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at ham sandwich 1.00
be used to hamburger 0.82
be at pizza 0.81
be eat from dish 0.79
hold salad 0.79
be at burger king 0.78
be at deli 0.78
be used to burger king 0.78
be cook or uncooked 0.77
be find in steak hous 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.22
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(food, be at pizza)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(meat, be at ham sandwich)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(fast food, be used to hamburger)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(meat, be at ham sandwich)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(item, hold salad)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(meat, be at ham sandwich)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(fast food, be used to burger king)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(meat, be at ham sandwich)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(meat, be at ham sandwich)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(fast food, be used to hamburger)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(meat, be at ham sandwich)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(fast food, be used to burger king)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(meat, be at ham sandwich)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(food, be at pizza)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(meat, be at ham sandwich)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(item, hold salad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(meat, be at ham sandwich)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(food, be at pizza)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(meat, be at ham sandwich)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(item, hold salad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(meat, be at ham sandwich)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be used to hamburger)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(meat, be at ham sandwich)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be used to burger king)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(meat, be at ham sandwich)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(hamburger, be at pizza)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(meat, be at ham sandwich)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(hamburger, be at burger king)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(food, be at pizza)
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(meat, be at ham sandwich)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(meat, be at ham sandwich)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(fast food, be used to hamburger)
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(meat, be at ham sandwich)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(meat, be at ham sandwich)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(item, hold salad)
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(meat, be at ham sandwich)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(meat, be at ham sandwich)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(fast food, be used to burger king)
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(meat, be at ham sandwich)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(meat, be at ham sandwich)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(meat, be at ham sandwich)
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(hamburger, be at burger king)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(hamburger, be at burger king)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(meat, be at ham sandwich)
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(hamburger, be at pizza)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(hamburger, be at pizza)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(meat, be at ham sandwich)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(meat, be at ham sandwich)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(meat, be at ham sandwich)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(meat, be find in steak hous)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(meat, be at ham sandwich)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(meat, be find in steak hous)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(meat, be at ham sandwich)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(meat, be find in steak hous)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(meat, be at ham sandwich)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(meat, be at deli)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(meat, be at ham sandwich)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(meat, be at deli)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(meat, be at ham sandwich)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(meat, be at deli)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(meat, be at ham sandwich)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(meat, be at deli)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(meat, be at ham sandwich)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(meat, be find in steak hous)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(meat, be at ham sandwich)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(meat, be at ham sandwich)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(meat, be at ham sandwich)

Typical implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(meat, be at ham sandwich)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(meat, be at ham sandwich)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(meat, be at ham sandwich)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(fast food, be used to hamburger)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(meat, be at ham sandwich)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(food, be at pizza)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(meat, be at ham sandwich)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(item, hold salad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(meat, be at ham sandwich)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(fast food, be used to burger king)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(meat, be at ham sandwich)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(hamburger, be at pizza)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(meat, be at ham sandwich)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(hamburger, be at burger king)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(meat, be at ham sandwich)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(fast food, be used to hamburger)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(meat, be at ham sandwich)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(food, be at pizza)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(meat, be at ham sandwich)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(item, hold salad)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(meat, be at ham sandwich)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(fast food, be used to burger king)