fast food: be used to hamburger

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.85
, junk food
Weight: 0.83
, commodity
Weight: 0.68
, food
Weight: 0.66
, industry
Weight: 0.65
Siblings chinese food
Weight: 0.75
, hot dog
Weight: 0.70
, pizza
Weight: 0.68
, meat
Weight: 0.63
, taco
Weight: 0.57

Related properties

Property Similarity
be used to hamburger 1.00
be at hamburger joint 0.91
be at ham sandwich 0.82
be used to burger king 0.81
be at pizza 0.81
be eat in bun 0.80
be at pizza store 0.79
be used to eat food 0.79
be used to meal 0.77
be at fast food restaurant 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(fast food restaurant, be used to eat food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(fast food, be used to hamburger)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(fast food restaurant, be used to hamburger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(fast food, be used to hamburger)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(food, be at pizza) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(fast food, be used to hamburger)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(fast food, be used to hamburger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(fast food restaurant, be used to hamburger)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(fast food, be used to hamburger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(food, be at pizza)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(fast food, be used to hamburger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(fast food restaurant, be used to eat food)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be used to hamburger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(food, be at pizza)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be used to hamburger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be used to hamburger)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be used to hamburger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be used to eat food)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be used to hamburger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(meat, be at ham sandwich)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be used to hamburger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, be eat in bun)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be used to hamburger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(pizza, be at pizza store)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be used to hamburger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(meat, be used to meal)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(fast food restaurant, be used to hamburger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(fast food, be used to hamburger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(fast food, be used to hamburger)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(food, be at pizza) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(fast food, be used to hamburger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(fast food, be used to hamburger)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(fast food restaurant, be used to eat food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(fast food, be used to hamburger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(fast food, be used to hamburger)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(fast food, be used to hamburger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(meat, be used to meal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(meat, be used to meal)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(fast food, be used to hamburger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(meat, be at ham sandwich) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(meat, be at ham sandwich)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(fast food, be used to hamburger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(hot dog, be eat in bun) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(hot dog, be eat in bun)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(fast food, be used to hamburger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(pizza, be at pizza store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(pizza, be at pizza store)

Salient implies Plausible

0.12
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(fast food, be used to hamburger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(fast food, be used to hamburger)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(fast food, be used to hamburger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(fast food, be at hamburger joint)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(fast food, be used to hamburger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(fast food, be used to burger king)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(fast food, be used to hamburger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be at hamburger joint)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(fast food, be used to hamburger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(fast food, be at hamburger joint)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(fast food, be used to hamburger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(fast food, be at fast food restaurant)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(fast food, be used to hamburger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(fast food, be used to hamburger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be used to hamburger)

Typical implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(fast food, be used to hamburger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(fast food, be used to hamburger)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be used to hamburger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, be used to eat food)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be used to hamburger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, be used to hamburger)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be used to hamburger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(food, be at pizza)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be used to hamburger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(pizza, be at pizza store)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be used to hamburger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(meat, be used to meal)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be used to hamburger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(hot dog, be eat in bun)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be used to hamburger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(meat, be at ham sandwich)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(fast food, be used to hamburger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, be used to eat food)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(fast food, be used to hamburger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, be used to hamburger)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(fast food, be used to hamburger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(food, be at pizza)