hamburger: be considered unhealthy

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents meat
Weight: 0.72
, meal
Weight: 0.71
, food
Weight: 0.67
, fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.66
, sausage
Weight: 0.65
Siblings cheeseburger
Weight: 0.38
, sandwich
Weight: 0.37
, pizza
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered unhealthy 1.00
is unhealthy 0.95
be considered junk food 0.77
be stigmatized as junk food 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.62
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(food, is unhealthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(hamburger, be considered unhealthy)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(sausage, is unhealthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(hamburger, be considered unhealthy)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(meat, is unhealthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(hamburger, be considered unhealthy)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(fast food restaurant, is unhealthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(hamburger, be considered unhealthy)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(hamburger, be considered unhealthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(fast food restaurant, is unhealthy)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(hamburger, be considered unhealthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(meat, is unhealthy)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(hamburger, be considered unhealthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(sausage, is unhealthy)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(hamburger, be considered unhealthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(food, is unhealthy)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.53
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(hamburger, be considered unhealthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, is unhealthy)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(hamburger, be considered unhealthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(sausage, is unhealthy)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(hamburger, be considered unhealthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(meat, is unhealthy)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(hamburger, be considered unhealthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(food, is unhealthy)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(hamburger, be considered unhealthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(pizza, be considered unhealthy)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(hamburger, be considered unhealthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, is unhealthy)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(hamburger, be considered unhealthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(cheeseburger, is unhealthy)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(hamburger, be considered unhealthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(pizza, is unhealthy)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(hamburger, be considered unhealthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(pizza, be considered junk food)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(food, is unhealthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(hamburger, be considered unhealthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(hamburger, be considered unhealthy)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(sausage, is unhealthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(hamburger, be considered unhealthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(hamburger, be considered unhealthy)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(meat, is unhealthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(hamburger, be considered unhealthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(hamburger, be considered unhealthy)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(fast food restaurant, is unhealthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(hamburger, be considered unhealthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(hamburger, be considered unhealthy)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(hamburger, be considered unhealthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(pizza, be considered unhealthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(pizza, be considered unhealthy)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(hamburger, be considered unhealthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(pizza, be considered junk food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(pizza, be considered junk food)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(hamburger, be considered unhealthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(sandwich, is unhealthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(sandwich, is unhealthy)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(hamburger, be considered unhealthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(cheeseburger, is unhealthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(cheeseburger, is unhealthy)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(hamburger, be considered unhealthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(pizza, is unhealthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(pizza, is unhealthy)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(hamburger, be considered unhealthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(hamburger, be considered unhealthy)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(hamburger, be considered unhealthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(hamburger, is unhealthy)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(hamburger, be considered unhealthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(hamburger, is unhealthy)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(hamburger, be considered unhealthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(hamburger, is unhealthy)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(hamburger, be considered unhealthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(hamburger, is unhealthy)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(hamburger, be considered unhealthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(hamburger, be stigmatized as junk food)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(hamburger, be considered unhealthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(hamburger, be stigmatized as junk food)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(hamburger, be considered unhealthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(hamburger, be stigmatized as junk food)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(hamburger, be considered unhealthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(hamburger, be stigmatized as junk food)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(hamburger, be considered unhealthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(hamburger, be considered junk food)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(hamburger, be considered unhealthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(hamburger, be considered junk food)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(hamburger, be considered unhealthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(hamburger, be considered junk food)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(hamburger, be considered unhealthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(hamburger, be considered junk food)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(hamburger, be considered unhealthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(hamburger, be considered unhealthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(hamburger, be considered unhealthy)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(hamburger, be considered unhealthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(hamburger, be considered unhealthy)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(hamburger, be considered unhealthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, is unhealthy)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(hamburger, be considered unhealthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(meat, is unhealthy)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(hamburger, be considered unhealthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(sausage, is unhealthy)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(hamburger, be considered unhealthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(food, is unhealthy)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(hamburger, be considered unhealthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(pizza, be considered unhealthy)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(hamburger, be considered unhealthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(sandwich, is unhealthy)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(hamburger, be considered unhealthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(cheeseburger, is unhealthy)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(hamburger, be considered unhealthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(pizza, is unhealthy)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(hamburger, be considered unhealthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(pizza, be considered junk food)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(hamburger, be considered unhealthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, is unhealthy)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(hamburger, be considered unhealthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(meat, is unhealthy)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(hamburger, be considered unhealthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(sausage, is unhealthy)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(hamburger, be considered unhealthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(food, is unhealthy)