hamster: is rodent

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents pet
Weight: 0.74
, creature
Weight: 0.59
, guinea pig
Weight: 0.58
, animal
Weight: 0.58
, species
Weight: 0.55
Siblings cat
Weight: 0.38
, kitten
Weight: 0.37
, monkey
Weight: 0.37
, rabbit
Weight: 0.37
, dog
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
is rodent 1.00
be better than rats 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.65
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(guinea pig, is rodent)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(hamster, is rodent)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(hamster, is rodent)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(guinea pig, is rodent)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.10
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(hamster, is rodent)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(guinea pig, is rodent)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(guinea pig, is rodent)
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(hamster, is rodent)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(hamster, is rodent)

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(hamster, is rodent)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(hamster, is rodent)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(hamster, is rodent)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(hamster, be better than rats)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(hamster, is rodent)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(hamster, be better than rats)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(hamster, is rodent)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(hamster, be better than rats)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(hamster, is rodent)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(hamster, be better than rats)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(hamster, is rodent)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(hamster, is rodent)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(hamster, is rodent)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(hamster, is rodent)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(hamster, is rodent)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(hamster, is rodent)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(guinea pig, is rodent)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(hamster, is rodent)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(guinea pig, is rodent)