hardness: be bad in water

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents characteristic
Weight: 0.67
, factor
Weight: 0.63
, parameter
Weight: 0.63
, quality
Weight: 0.61
, variable
Weight: 0.56
Siblings tensile strength
Weight: 0.36
, viscosity
Weight: 0.35
, texture
Weight: 0.35
, toughness
Weight: 0.34
, modulus
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad in water 1.00
be important in water 0.88
be bad on snapchat 0.86
be bad on instagram 0.86
affect water 0.84
affect safety of water for drinking 0.81
has quality bad 0.81
be higher than water 0.78
be produced in water 0.77
affect water cycle 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(variable, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(hardness, be bad in water)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(factor, affect water cycle)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(hardness, be bad in water)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(quality, be bad on snapchat)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(hardness, be bad in water)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(quality, be bad on instagram)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(hardness, be bad in water)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(quality, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(hardness, be bad in water)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(hardness, be bad in water)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(quality, be bad on instagram)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(hardness, be bad in water)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(quality, be bad on snapchat)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(hardness, be bad in water)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(quality, has quality bad)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(hardness, be bad in water)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(factor, affect water cycle)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(hardness, be bad in water)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(variable, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.49
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(hardness, be bad in water)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(quality, be bad on instagram)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(hardness, be bad in water)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(quality, be bad on snapchat)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(hardness, be bad in water)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(quality, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(hardness, be bad in water)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(variable, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(hardness, be bad in water)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(factor, affect water cycle)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(hardness, be bad in water)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(texture, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(hardness, be bad in water)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(viscosity, be higher than water)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(quality, be bad on snapchat)
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(hardness, be bad in water)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(hardness, be bad in water)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(quality, be bad on instagram)
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(hardness, be bad in water)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(hardness, be bad in water)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(variable, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(hardness, be bad in water)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(hardness, be bad in water)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(quality, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(hardness, be bad in water)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(hardness, be bad in water)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(factor, affect water cycle)
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(hardness, be bad in water)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(hardness, be bad in water)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(hardness, be bad in water)
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(texture, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(texture, has quality bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(hardness, be bad in water)
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(viscosity, be higher than water)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(viscosity, be higher than water)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(hardness, be bad in water)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(hardness, be bad in water)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(hardness, be bad in water)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(hardness, affect water)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(hardness, be bad in water)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(hardness, affect water)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(hardness, be bad in water)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(hardness, be produced in water)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(hardness, be bad in water)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(hardness, be produced in water)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(hardness, be bad in water)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(hardness, be produced in water)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(hardness, be bad in water)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(hardness, affect water)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(hardness, be bad in water)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(hardness, be important in water)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(hardness, be bad in water)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(hardness, be important in water)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(hardness, be bad in water)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(hardness, affect safety of water for drinking)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(hardness, be bad in water)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(hardness, be produced in water)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(hardness, be bad in water)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(hardness, affect safety of water for drinking)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(hardness, be bad in water)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(hardness, be important in water)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(hardness, be bad in water)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(hardness, be important in water)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(hardness, be bad in water)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(hardness, affect safety of water for drinking)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(hardness, be bad in water)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(hardness, affect safety of water for drinking)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(hardness, be bad in water)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(hardness, affect water)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(hardness, be bad in water)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(hardness, be bad in water)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(hardness, be bad in water)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(hardness, be bad in water)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(hardness, be bad in water)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(hardness, be bad in water)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(quality, be bad on instagram)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(hardness, be bad in water)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(quality, be bad on snapchat)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(hardness, be bad in water)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(quality, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(hardness, be bad in water)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(variable, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(hardness, be bad in water)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(factor, affect water cycle)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(hardness, be bad in water)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(texture, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(hardness, be bad in water)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(viscosity, be higher than water)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(hardness, be bad in water)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(quality, be bad on instagram)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(hardness, be bad in water)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(quality, be bad on snapchat)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(hardness, be bad in water)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(quality, has quality bad)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(hardness, be bad in water)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(variable, has quality bad)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(hardness, be bad in water)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(factor, affect water cycle)