hardware: be important to computer

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents merchandise
Weight: 0.64
, operating system
Weight: 0.64
, engineering
Weight: 0.61
, module
Weight: 0.59
, strategy
Weight: 0.59
Siblings software
Weight: 0.35
, electronics
Weight: 0.34
, unix
Weight: 0.33
, solaris
Weight: 0.33
, macintosh
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important to computer 1.00
be important in computer 1.00
be important for computer 0.99
be important for computer systems 0.93
be needed in computer 0.92
be needed in computer system 0.89
be necessary for computer system 0.89
be written for computer 0.87
interact with computer 0.85
do task on computer 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(operating system, be necessary for computer system)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(hardware, be important to computer)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(operating system, be important in computer)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(hardware, be important to computer)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(operating system, be needed in computer system)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(hardware, be important to computer)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(operating system, be written for computer)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(hardware, be important to computer)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(hardware, be important to computer)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(operating system, be important in computer)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(hardware, be important to computer)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(operating system, be written for computer)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(hardware, be important to computer)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(operating system, be needed in computer system)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(hardware, be important to computer)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(operating system, be necessary for computer system)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(hardware, be important to computer)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(operating system, be important in computer)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(hardware, be important to computer)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(operating system, be written for computer)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(hardware, be important to computer)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(operating system, be needed in computer system)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(hardware, be important to computer)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(operating system, be necessary for computer system)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(hardware, be important to computer)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(software, be important to computer)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(hardware, be important to computer)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(software, do task on computer)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(hardware, be important to computer)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(software, be important for computer)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(hardware, be important to computer)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(software, interact with computer)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(hardware, be important to computer)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(software, be needed in computer)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(hardware, be important to computer)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(software, be important for computer systems)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(operating system, be important in computer)
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(hardware, be important to computer)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(hardware, be important to computer)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(operating system, be necessary for computer system)
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(hardware, be important to computer)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(hardware, be important to computer)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(operating system, be needed in computer system)
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(hardware, be important to computer)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(hardware, be important to computer)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(operating system, be written for computer)
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(hardware, be important to computer)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(hardware, be important to computer)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(hardware, be important to computer)
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(software, be important to computer)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(software, be important to computer)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(hardware, be important to computer)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(software, be needed in computer)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(software, be needed in computer)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(hardware, be important to computer)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(software, be important for computer)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(software, be important for computer)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(hardware, be important to computer)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(software, be important for computer systems)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(software, be important for computer systems)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(hardware, be important to computer)
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(software, interact with computer)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(software, interact with computer)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(hardware, be important to computer)
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(software, do task on computer)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(software, do task on computer)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(hardware, be important to computer)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(hardware, be important to computer)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(hardware, be important to computer)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(hardware, be needed in computer)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(hardware, be important to computer)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(hardware, be needed in computer)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(hardware, be important to computer)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(hardware, be needed in computer)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(hardware, be important to computer)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(hardware, be needed in computer)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(hardware, be important to computer)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(hardware, be important to computer)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(hardware, be important to computer)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(hardware, be important to computer)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(hardware, be important to computer)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(hardware, be important to computer)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(operating system, be important in computer)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(hardware, be important to computer)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(operating system, be needed in computer system)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(hardware, be important to computer)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(operating system, be necessary for computer system)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(hardware, be important to computer)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(operating system, be written for computer)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(hardware, be important to computer)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(software, be needed in computer)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(hardware, be important to computer)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(software, be important to computer)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(hardware, be important to computer)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(software, interact with computer)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(hardware, be important to computer)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(software, be important for computer)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(hardware, be important to computer)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(software, do task on computer)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(hardware, be important to computer)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(software, be important for computer systems)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(hardware, be important to computer)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(operating system, be important in computer)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(hardware, be important to computer)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(operating system, be needed in computer system)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(hardware, be important to computer)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(operating system, be necessary for computer system)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(hardware, be important to computer)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(operating system, be written for computer)