hardwood: be better for environment

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents surface
Weight: 0.61
, material
Weight: 0.59
, type
Weight: 0.55
, product
Weight: 0.54
, flooring
Weight: 0.52
Siblings mahogany
Weight: 0.75
, teak
Weight: 0.71
, ash
Weight: 0.61
, ebony
Weight: 0.50
, wood pulp
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better for environment 1.00
be bad for environment 0.93
has quality better 0.83
is stronger 0.75
has quality good 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(hardwood, be better for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(ebony, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(hardwood, be better for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(mahogany, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(hardwood, be better for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(mahogany, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(mahogany, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(hardwood, be better for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(ebony, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(ebony, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(hardwood, be better for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(hardwood, be better for environment)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(hardwood, be better for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(hardwood, be bad for environment)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(hardwood, be better for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(hardwood, be bad for environment)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(hardwood, be better for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(hardwood, be bad for environment)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(hardwood, be better for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(hardwood, be bad for environment)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(hardwood, be better for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(hardwood, has quality better)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(hardwood, be better for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(hardwood, is stronger)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(hardwood, be better for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(hardwood, has quality better)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(hardwood, be better for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(hardwood, has quality better)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(hardwood, be better for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(hardwood, has quality better)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(hardwood, be better for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(hardwood, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(hardwood, be better for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(hardwood, is stronger)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(hardwood, be better for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(hardwood, is stronger)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(hardwood, be better for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(hardwood, is stronger)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(hardwood, be better for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(hardwood, has quality good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(hardwood, be better for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(hardwood, has quality good)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(hardwood, be better for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(hardwood, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(hardwood, be better for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(hardwood, be better for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(hardwood, be better for environment)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(hardwood, be better for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(hardwood, be better for environment)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(hardwood, be better for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(ebony, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(hardwood, be better for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(mahogany, has quality good)